X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PNVxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=mUvYIzQhJ/htianyUqExtQ==:117 a=SXYfLeleOI9ov9oRFljfZA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=CKeqCrOqW6IA:10 a=0o9FgrsRnhwA:10 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=lKPQtorlAAAA:8 a=MMMxZlE7AAAA:8 a=UKPAHat8AAAA:8 a=s1I-Y6CqAAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=UlnjnI9KNHHL77dgpVYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=TbTuEfNj71wA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=5YQ6H4ZxyGn-KoBYtt8s:22 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=opVyWQfbEivB9Nt9EY2k:22 a=c1TPop_4XmU7Vuhlasjn:22 a=Fc6xXSS-RxGHxrvp76Qp:22 a=1z8CZO-gz1oi-LRGHyP3:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com ([209.85.210.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.13) with ESMTPS id 12748404 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:10:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.179; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id q10so714826pff.9 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:10:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=roLzcahcloK6SDhvsB52hMnbUTYVqdzDqzk++LzMdLo=; b=SCeJhNsaB52v3jA+o8SE91GEXhrEJ6FzctgvMkYRZt2MQE9PNupg/LKBcSxhRBRo6P j5YHAKXYyxG89ELYvQGg+UEZxfspvLNxoohfVbNpY9VT21BGxf/NPGgm8MrqxW11i5S8 iSPWs3cgM7eX2wLIAXNJpZwWOYmFE8mhaQRGJ0UOU3uyyU8cCqFTZIa1DTRDg17XVUNV NsvgieKmedr+LXWGAGwSTfMsuCjZRzpJrUrAoKrRmbgvPT7soLvUTc24wJpBCuD2Kk89 JZ0xqWxVQInjgDs44rDU1lVgbxOiSOo50y1ozXODzq1Bo1X2L0NiWYfN9YBV93PNTDa5 SBlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=roLzcahcloK6SDhvsB52hMnbUTYVqdzDqzk++LzMdLo=; b=TwBLmaPQmvBzj0JeVN+2wv2Qy4F0Rv7lwXva5sMo9bKj96ahVTFh5iTUkcozwXH6EY HUvjBcAcJi9h1AFhdAd8NUi6fwaVfr1mQQW2gRlOVuS8W2+0h9RrqabanbGRxcf6Efuh YA/0mnPXob4/cnXNL25HPbpJCaHLa60EoJIIwbqnkcfiUDl9SzvRDS+1EgSOfta/kiqV lBZtNsMjB7acWsiNC2nkE+SHD71Jsy+jRoR2oMyBMtrsaSssXkdyprui2UDRhePk3NmA zCQr6vQ6Jkj4NHTtS+OY5g815HDrTMJZy2AD/gFA0X/6A+CDpFdLVvLEE4kGMdM6iovj 1qiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXI2XUxTS8DnvRzPTEqM+S8ua2vx+47rLhImlX4xWl/4HxIuhki +ZIFAyw9z83gxJosN6zeTZooAeLg X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymXAVjSFPewQPVx6/2GR2mrb5poTrK8qvUb0kmolxy1bD/1Y7Ft3eeaLNa955Mxe/jy1na8A== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6281:: with SMTP id f1mr33591484pgv.400.1562746231839; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from steves-mbp.lan ([118.209.171.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p20sm3355699pgj.47.2019.07.10.01.10.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: Re: [FlyRotary] timing on renesis engines Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:26 +0800 References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Hi Fin The coil trigger will come direct from the processor outputs I expect.=20= So your right, the coils will see whatever the bus is, whatever the = alternator is doing. Steve > On 9 Jul 2019, at 10:52 pm, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net = wrote: >=20 > Disregard. Those drivers are most likely for the injectors. Don't have = the EC3 schematic so no clue what drives the coils. >=20 > Finn >=20 > On 7/9/2019 10:35 AM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote: >> All EC3 drivers are IRL530NS power MOSFETs with a on-resistance of = 0.1 ohms. >>=20 >> So the voltage the coils see will pretty much be whatever your 12 = volt bus is -- whatever the alternator outputs. >>=20 >> Haven't looked at the program code but suspect that coil sees full = voltage during the dwell time -- simple on/off. >>=20 >> Finn >>=20 >> On 7/8/2019 9:24 PM, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com wrote: >>> Depends what voltage it's??nominal at. >>> Look at the Miata link, it shows actual GM dwell settings from their = ECU. >>>=20 >>> You'll see RPM vs voltage for the dwell settings. I don't know how = Tracy's computer handles the dwell. >>>=20 >>> - Matt Boiteau >>>> On 2019-07-08 7:17:34 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> So which MS document do we take as being the good oil for the LS2 = coils. Is it 4.0mS or 3.5mS ?=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Steve Izett=20 >>>>=20 >>>> > On 9 Jul 2019, at 6:04 am, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com = wrote:=20 >>>> >=20 >>>> > That's an outdated page. I'm not sure why they even keep them = alive.=20 >>>> > http://www.msextra.com/doc/pdf/MS3baseV30_Hardware-1.4.pdf=20 >>>> > Page 93=20 >>>> >=20 >>>> > Of course that number depends what voltage is consider at = "nominal". Not sure if Tracy's changes value based on voltage or not. = And RPM vs Manifold pressure=20 >>>> >=20 >>>> > = https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/lsx-coil-thread-82744/p= age8/#post1380088 >>>> >=20 >>>> >=20 >>>> >=20 >>>> > - Matt Boiteau=20 >>>> >> On 2019-07-08 11:58:11 AM, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net = wrote:=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> Matt,=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> How did you end up with 3.5ms for the D585???s? At least one = Megasquirt resource shows 4.0ms at 14VDC. My concern is the wide range = between Tracy???s LS1 4.3ms and the 3.5ms referenced. If the = megasqiurt information is correct then Tracy was very conservative = with the LS1 settings. 4.0ms vs 5.6ms.=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> Bobby=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]=20 >>>> >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2019 8:03 PM=20 >>>> >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 >>>> >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> For the LS2 - D585 truck coils, 3.5ms is the recommended dwell.=20= >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> - Matt Boiteau=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> On 2019-07-05 7:37:10 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote:=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> Thanks Bobby and Lyn.=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> According to Tracy???s code - 2.6 mSec RX8, 3.5 mSec RX7, 4.0 = mSec LS2, 4.3 mSec LS1.=20 >>>> >> I also wondered about the timing difference between the various = coils trigger circuit actually firing.=20 >>>> >> Now I suppose that difference might be a few uSec and = insignificant, but if its 100uSec=20 >>>> >> then the timing difference between various coil types might = become significant.=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> @ 7000 RPM=20 >>>> >> 1 rev takes 8.6mSec=20 >>>> >> So each degree of EShaft rotation is 24uSec.=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> Thanks again for the help.=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> Steve=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> > On 6 Jul 2019, at 2:52 am, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net = wrote:=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> > Lynn,=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> > Default is what ever Tracy set it to. The CAS location is not = adjustable so default is set in his code.=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> > Bobby=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> > Sent from my iPhone=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:43 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com = wrote:=20 >>>> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> What is the "Default" advance? Is that checked with a timing = light? Easy starting can be up to 15 degrees of advance. For full power = use up to 27 degrees of advance is good up to 10,500 RPM. Boosted = engines require less advance as boost increases. Because the effective = compression ratio as well as charge temperature is going up. Very high = boost my have advance closer to zero. Advance is used to allow full = combustion=20 >>>> >> >> of the charge before the exhaust port opens. At higher = pressure and temps the flame front speeds are increasing. So, less time = is needed. Thus less advance is needed. Lowering intake air temps with = an inter-cooler and adding water spray can allow higher boost.=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> Boosting to maintain sea level performance would probably not = shorten engine life. Boosting for additional performance does shorten = engine life. The kids get over 600 HP with boosted drag racing engines. = This is fine if you only need the engine for 9 seconds. You have to know = what the actual advance is to make any decision. Mark the flex plate or = flywheel teeth with paint so you can check actual advance during any = RPM.=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> It is difficult to detonate an NA engine. It is not difficult = detonate a boosted engine.=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> Lynn E. Hanover=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> In a message dated 7/5/2019 10:22:44 AM Eastern Standard = Time, flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> Steve,=20 >>>> >> >> I???m running default timing or maybe 1 degree advanced. = Early on I experimented with 1-2 degrees advance for many flight hours = and did not detect any noticeable change in engine performance. I did = push the engine to what I believe was detonation during a ground tuning = session. I was tuning under boost (44??? MP) , 7000 rpm with a wideband = O2 on each runner and adjusting Mode 9 and Mode 4. With F/A balanced = between each rotor and EGT???s under 1600F I was trying to see if = increasing timing would lower EGT???s. F/A was in the 11???s. This was = at the end of the session and the engine and supercharger were already = hot. I think I had added 4-5 degrees advance with no noticeable EGT = decrease when I encountered a mild bang or misfire. This condition was = well above my 38??? MP limit I sometimes use for takeoff.=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> I???m curious about the dwell time setting difference between = LS1 and LS2 coils. I switched to LS2 coils sometime back with no = failures to date. I remember seeing an option setting in some of the = code you or Finn posted. Internet research indicates LS2 coils require = less dwell time than LS1. Possibly 0.5-1 ms less.=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> Bobby=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> Sent from my iPad=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:58 AM, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote:=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> > Hi there Guys=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> > Of the guys with Renesis engines using EC2/3 can you = comment on your timing settings.=20 >>>> >> >> > I???ve to date left the timing at the default setting = figuring its set by the location of the CAS.=20 >>>> >> >> > Not sure if the various coil options have different trigger = timing latency.=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> > Thanks=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> > Steve Izett=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> >=20 >>>> >> >> > --=20 >>>> >> >> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >>>> >> >> > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>>> >> >>=20 >>>> >> >> --=20 >>>> >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >>>> >> >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >> --=20 >>>> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >>>> >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>> >>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> --=20 >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >>>> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20