X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PNVxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=i5xzRy8GnMa4EVhs8Gqg6w==:117 a=f1qN84ZeyRs0DA6dsddh0w==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=CKeqCrOqW6IA:10 a=0o9FgrsRnhwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=lKPQtorlAAAA:8 a=MMMxZlE7AAAA:8 a=UKPAHat8AAAA:8 a=s1I-Y6CqAAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=5TynelurHPoeo92ZYpwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=TbTuEfNj71wA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=opVyWQfbEivB9Nt9EY2k:22 a=c1TPop_4XmU7Vuhlasjn:22 a=Fc6xXSS-RxGHxrvp76Qp:22 a=1z8CZO-gz1oi-LRGHyP3:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.13) with ESMTPS id 12744814 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 18:57:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.173; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id q10so8291824pff.9 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=wBYmtninVs3Y+jQZ2Un7vCG/EAIrDlwqGda4htbmlHw=; b=fr2xleDcwO0lC2Q9jseSo6eYc5IN8m4p0VFLRbeiQdDZrHaYCQN9MbQKmAgJcH+n94 6ntViTtzyEZPc3UyIdxNM0mDmyA97xYFt5DW6eugxfvkA4m9Tk+FsomyLm/O6BW5x+Bt 4Z/HMoxmTVtYiuICKXkHWXadTB3Mv76+y6Q3me3w4Q3uJpiO2GRPUllIR+Rmzs6H3iG0 0ADxR1hVv259tYXCpFHiN5DjOMbsCk9GYc2dtnvgDtMs1C2+lUcZorqCh/Cvpp1qDbrN Um1dXuZaVxw/WBEBAl8hDBhjklnMci2FSFG1ZtN5OeSkj2102gWzkOKq/DXtlMEBMmp9 tPcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=wBYmtninVs3Y+jQZ2Un7vCG/EAIrDlwqGda4htbmlHw=; b=mN5MBebY2dGC5B9yhHtRC4b2JvqdGpyU09Ji1nueWblS6s39vmlSIssKM1FdZUKNSW kgTJUnkcdmRKyq7qleQE1IdOa8NH+Qz4Y0CkMfqML4LaJ3tm3/O91tdVJ0QRfFn8NZJ7 5/iNYqhAXrW4DofVJHAIPTtFqWxPch8D/nKvlmoev8b8740RCla2hoMfF53bOWeWjWV7 +DxAt358N2DamnI4iD5COF73ihrPFjvodU9u0KwNqUASRJ7wHx/sxkrSlAOQuiDwvyQ4 V4Fn6zbKFiOqcxFHz4C7M1gsQXL47dKVKeI/JW7zHXMAzIW3k8ZU/XkVgX2qParBr8Vu wn6A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXI7gQ0d0MHgHTo6cVbQctHewPA5dxdfwji/4vrHVroTe3d+Xv/ 17Wj9qX9Gvz4pKHDE26Sfi+OLuSP X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOz8kpFlAl6yZm4YYzUNiihc26HOaUko4OvMC4pu8vnOycMUbMzrGhLQwzWydLI+CRhZ75Ng== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e953:: with SMTP id q19mr26800836pgj.313.1562626616731; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from steves-mbp.lan ([118.209.166.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm26001242pfb.119.2019.07.08.15.56.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 06:56:52 +0800 References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <39F3D7D7-143E-4004-AFE2-E240914394A8@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) So which MS document do we take as being the good oil for the LS2 coils. = Is it 4.0mS or 3.5mS ? Steve Izett > On 9 Jul 2019, at 6:04 am, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com = wrote: >=20 > That's an outdated page. I'm not sure why they even keep them alive. > http://www.msextra.com/doc/pdf/MS3baseV30_Hardware-1.4.pdf > Page 93 >=20 > Of course that number depends what voltage is consider at "nominal". = Not sure if Tracy's changes value based on voltage or not. And RPM vs = Manifold pressure >=20 > = https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/lsx-coil-thread-82744/p= age8/#post1380088 >=20 >=20 >=20 > - Matt Boiteau >> On 2019-07-08 11:58:11 AM, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net = wrote: >>=20 >> Matt, >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> How did you end up with 3.5ms for the D585=E2=80=99s? At least one = Megasquirt resource shows 4.0ms at 14VDC. My concern is the wide range = between Tracy=E2=80=99s LS1 4.3ms and the 3.5ms referenced. If the = megasqiurt information is correct then Tracy was very conservative with = the LS1 settings. 4.0ms vs 5.6ms. >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> Bobby >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]=20= >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2019 8:03 PM >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> For the LS2 - D585 truck coils, 3.5ms is the recommended dwell. >> =20 >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> - Matt Boiteau >>=20 >> On 2019-07-05 7:37:10 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote: >>=20 >> Thanks Bobby and Lyn.=20 >>=20 >> According to Tracy=E2=80=99s code - 2.6 mSec RX8, 3.5 mSec RX7, 4.0 = mSec LS2, 4.3 mSec LS1.=20 >> I also wondered about the timing difference between the various coils = trigger circuit actually firing.=20 >> Now I suppose that difference might be a few uSec and insignificant, = but if its 100uSec=20 >> then the timing difference between various coil types might become = significant.=20 >>=20 >> @ 7000 RPM=20 >> 1 rev takes 8.6mSec=20 >> So each degree of EShaft rotation is 24uSec.=20 >>=20 >> Thanks again for the help.=20 >>=20 >> Steve=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> > On 6 Jul 2019, at 2:52 am, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net wrote:=20= >> >=20 >> > Lynn,=20 >> >=20 >> > Default is what ever Tracy set it to. The CAS location is not = adjustable so default is set in his code.=20 >> >=20 >> > Bobby=20 >> >=20 >> > Sent from my iPhone=20 >> >=20 >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:43 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com wrote:=20 >> >=20 >> >> What is the "Default" advance? Is that checked with a timing = light? Easy starting can be up to 15 degrees of advance. For full power = use up to 27 degrees of advance is good up to 10,500 RPM. Boosted = engines require less advance as boost increases. Because the effective = compression ratio as well as charge temperature is going up. Very high = boost my have advance closer to zero. Advance is used to allow full = combustion=20 >> >> of the charge before the exhaust port opens. At higher pressure = and temps the flame front speeds are increasing. So, less time is = needed. Thus less advance is needed. Lowering intake air temps with an = inter-cooler and adding water spray can allow higher boost.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Boosting to maintain sea level performance would probably not = shorten engine life. Boosting for additional performance does shorten = engine life. The kids get over 600 HP with boosted drag racing engines. = This is fine if you only need the engine for 9 seconds. You have to know = what the actual advance is to make any decision. Mark the flex plate or = flywheel teeth with paint so you can check actual advance during any = RPM.=20 >> >>=20 >> >>=20 >> >> It is difficult to detonate an NA engine. It is not difficult = detonate a boosted engine.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Lynn E. Hanover=20 >> >>=20 >> >>=20 >> >> In a message dated 7/5/2019 10:22:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, = flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Steve,=20 >> >> I=E2=80=99m running default timing or maybe 1 degree advanced. = Early on I experimented with 1-2 degrees advance for many flight hours = and did not detect any noticeable change in engine performance. I did = push the engine to what I believe was detonation during a ground tuning = session. I was tuning under boost (44=E2=80=9D MP) , 7000 rpm with a = wideband O2 on each runner and adjusting Mode 9 and Mode 4. With F/A = balanced between each rotor and EGT=E2=80=99s under 1600F I was trying = to see if increasing timing would lower EGT=E2=80=99s. F/A was in the = 11=E2=80=99s. This was at the end of the session and the engine and = supercharger were already hot. I think I had added 4-5 degrees advance = with no noticeable EGT decrease when I encountered a mild bang or = misfire. This condition was well above my 38=E2=80=9D MP limit I = sometimes use for takeoff.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> I=E2=80=99m curious about the dwell time setting difference = between LS1 and LS2 coils. I switched to LS2 coils sometime back with no = failures to date. I remember seeing an option setting in some of the = code you or Finn posted. Internet research indicates LS2 coils require = less dwell time than LS1. Possibly 0.5-1 ms less.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Bobby=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Sent from my iPad=20 >> >>=20 >> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:58 AM, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote:=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> > Hi there Guys=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> > Of the guys with Renesis engines using EC2/3 can you comment on = your timing settings.=20 >> >> > I=E2=80=99ve to date left the timing at the default setting = figuring its set by the location of the CAS.=20 >> >> > Not sure if the various coil options have different trigger = timing latency.=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> > Thanks=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> > Steve Izett=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> >=20 >> >> > --=20 >> >> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >> > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >> >>=20 >> >> --=20 >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >>=20 >>=20