X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PNVxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MV7hH7+FudNGeta8rjOQpA==:117 a=T7Eb+n+m9IlVTBMuP+kThw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=K7ySfSCCDxUA:10 a=0o9FgrsRnhwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=UKPAHat8AAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=wTEOXyh1h-1cUFMkV_IA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=6UjeSzUk7yQ4BTx2zOUA:9 a=HCXqqPCglqPH-_P1:21 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=Fc6xXSS-RxGHxrvp76Qp:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com" Received: from mail-vs1-f51.google.com ([209.85.217.51] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.13) with ESMTPS id 12738586 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 21:03:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.217.51; envelope-from=mattboiteau@gmail.com Received: by mail-vs1-f51.google.com with SMTP id u3so4798996vsh.6 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references :user-agent; bh=BtbwHyFmtjKwJK6cVDg5j/H4G+jS29gxo4dFcRgPHWM=; b=E9FQ8lprAq9VnbC/RhnpxQcFfcaIu8aKzIscD3UrVDA+XA35NI70HTHd2xoon1nMJT 5DsbfovajOZvgnQ22x00YZHD12Vkxb0+lqlfzB9/oVmx4Z8CiydARom4lHcaZBjjRbuj 0jD06ieqkjXrgcQPvGGywkz4tLbGlmqhMG/Jt0I18ryV0abMWfRJOGW/MMTj16YFlZsb fENmDJxRMReexPXNhE+cILEQm315x8cLYbJTQ0bAym+H5YLxooVrOF/2oPG0hEB/yaZ1 74ZJb2tDtTC/svGw0aZIoGHF2pMvlBVNYnLhsYjloXIyZ5rCAkaycXO+B27zFJi4+UeH IXMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :in-reply-to:references:user-agent; bh=BtbwHyFmtjKwJK6cVDg5j/H4G+jS29gxo4dFcRgPHWM=; b=kwmbLlvk6oclwkQjYGubl0IxE6Ekxo0L6phSugJcxfBy7tr9vPDGmo0dyJq8EGMjuM qeqe28GuLYQZkXtXYE1aGgutS5V/beCyjsFQ7qAOHHoIzANjtTc8m/9izl72SYutacmg 17HzXzxnknzy05WEB0LfcO8LmeXpYAwa7xpa1sd1BS88Et/Q/QLScdVKSIx5uVKCelep 5QTgTNMScIiKnysCau6YtlR5H09wnzz52fGeMr0quGcJwT7l/q76RSPWkuiFbwwOog6g TaJPuNWEhLU4ATRGrn4Lglu44w34XK+k9C3zXL/Kq5xXqewUyVxVSELgUiJofqXd/VhC 9MnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7Bl/0gE1Z+nPlpNLTnUXY/8eJiE82gi7gng+GyesQn0s+TD6H BCspk0LxSWkv6tamsqPULLUqGGeuCnA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5I/QPxH0c+zArPpYiW7Jmz7ENp0zEHGPR22PNQ1wFKozzhef09WFXSMD6KJazSMn/lgIibw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:d410:: with SMTP id c16mr4072515vsj.61.1562374996221; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.151] ([65.131.244.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13sm2431610vkc.26.2019.07.05.18.03.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_16005762.849680526277" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 21:03:14 -0400 Message-ID: <256253e9-9f93-419d-971b-9c2547a8e039@getmailbird.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines To: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Mailbird/2.5.43.0 X-Mailbird-ID: 256253e9-9f93-419d-971b-9c2547a8e039@getmailbird.com ------=_NextPart_16005762.849680526277 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For the LS2 -=C2=A0D585 truck coils, 3.5ms is the recommended dwell. =C2=A0 - Matt Boiteau On 2019-07-05 7:37:10 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Bobby and Lyn. According to Tracy=E2=80=99s code - 2.6 mSec RX8, 3.5 mSec RX7, 4.0 mSec LS= 2, 4.3 mSec LS1. I also wondered about the timing difference between the various coils trigg= er circuit actually firing. Now I suppose that difference might be a few uSec and insignificant, but if= its 100uSec then the timing difference between various coil types might become signific= ant. @ 7000 RPM 1 rev takes 8.6mSec So each degree of EShaft rotation is 24uSec. Thanks again for the help. Steve > On 6 Jul 2019, at 2:52 am, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net wrote: > > Lynn, > > Default is what ever Tracy set it to. The CAS location is not adjustable = so default is set in his code. > > Bobby > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:43 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com wrote: > >> What is the "Default" advance? Is that checked with a timing light? Easy= starting can be up to 15 degrees of advance. For full power use up to 27 d= egrees of advance is good up to 10,500 RPM. Boosted engines require less ad= vance as boost increases. Because the effective compression ratio as well a= s charge temperature is going up. Very high boost my have advance closer to= zero. Advance is used to allow full combustion >> of the charge before the exhaust port opens. At higher pressure and temp= s the flame front speeds are increasing. So, less time is needed. Thus less= advance is needed. Lowering intake air temps with an inter-cooler and addi= ng water spray can allow higher boost. >> >> Boosting to maintain sea level performance would probably not shorten en= gine life. Boosting for additional performance does shorten engine life. Th= e kids get over 600 HP with boosted drag racing engines. This is fine if yo= u only need the engine for 9 seconds. You have to know what the actual adva= nce is to make any decision. Mark the flex plate or flywheel teeth with pai= nt so you can check actual advance during any RPM. >> >> >> It is difficult to detonate an NA engine. It is not difficult detonate a= boosted engine. >> >> Lynn E. Hanover >> >> >> In a message dated 7/5/2019 10:22:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, flyrotary= @lancaironline.net writes: >> >> Steve, >> I=E2=80=99m running default timing or maybe 1 degree advanced. Early on = I experimented with 1-2 degrees advance for many flight hours and did not d= etect any noticeable change in engine performance. I did push the engine to= what I believe was detonation during a ground tuning session. I was tuning= under boost (44=E2=80=9D MP) , 7000 rpm with a wideband O2 on each runner = and adjusting Mode 9 and Mode 4. With F/A balanced between each rotor and E= GT=E2=80=99s under 1600F I was trying to see if increasing timing would low= er EGT=E2=80=99s. F/A was in the 11=E2=80=99s. This was at the end of the s= ession and the engine and supercharger were already hot. I think I had adde= d 4-5 degrees advance with no noticeable EGT decrease when I encountered a = mild bang or misfire. This condition was well above my 38=E2=80=9D MP limit= I sometimes use for takeoff. >> >> I=E2=80=99m curious about the dwell time setting difference between LS1 = and LS2 coils. I switched to LS2 coils sometime back with no failures to da= te. I remember seeing an option setting in some of the code you or Finn pos= ted. Internet research indicates LS2 coils require less dwell time than LS1= . Possibly 0.5-1 ms less. >> >> Bobby >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:58 AM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com wro= te: >> > >> > Hi there Guys >> > >> > Of the guys with Renesis engines using EC2/3 can you comment on your t= iming settings. >> > I=E2=80=99ve to date left the timing at the default setting figuring i= ts set by the location of the CAS. >> > Not sure if the various coil options have different trigger timing lat= ency. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Steve Izett >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/Li= st.html >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List= .html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.ht= ml ------=_NextPart_16005762.849680526277 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For the LS2 - D585 truck coils= , 3.5ms is the recommended dwell.
 

- Matt Boiteau

On 2= 019-07-05 7:37:10 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com <flyrotary@l= ancaironline.net> wrote:

Thanks Bobby and Lyn.=0D
=0D
According to Tracy=E2=80=99s c= ode - 2.6 mSec RX8, 3.5 mSec RX7, 4.0 mSec LS2, 4.3 mSec LS1.=0D
I also= wondered about the timing difference between the various coils trigger cir= cuit actually firing.=0D
Now I suppose that difference might be a few uS= ec and insignificant, but if its 100uSec =0D
then the timing difference = between various coil types might become significant.=0D
=0D
@ 7000 RP= M =0D
1 rev takes 8.6mSec=0D
So each degree of EShaft rotation is 24u= Sec.=0D
=0D
Thanks again for the help.=0D
=0D
Steve=0D
=0D=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
> On 6 Jul 2019, at 2:52 am, Bo= bby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net wrote:=0D
>= =0D
> Lynn,=0D
> =0D
> Default is what ever Tracy set it to. The = CAS location is not adjustable so default is set in his code. =0D
> =0D<= br>> Bobby=0D
> =0D
> Sent from my iPhone=0D
> =0D
> On Jul 5, = 2019, at 12:43 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com wrote:=0D
> =0D
>> What is the "Default" advance? Is that checked w= ith a timing light? Easy starting can be up to 15 degrees of advance. For f= ull power use up to 27 degrees of advance is good up to 10,500 RPM. Boosted= engines require less advance as boost increases. Because the effective com= pression ratio as well as charge temperature is going up. Very high boost m= y have advance closer to zero. Advance is used to allow full combustion=0D<= br>>> of the charge before the exhaust port opens. At higher pressure and t= emps the flame front speeds are increasing. So, less time is needed. Thus l= ess advance is needed. Lowering intake air temps with an inter-cooler and a= dding water spray can allow higher boost.=0D
>> =0D
>> Boosting to ma= intain sea level performance would probably not shorten engine life. Boosti= ng for additional performance does shorten engine life. The kids get over 6= 00 HP with boosted drag racing engines. This is fine if you only need the e= ngine for 9 seconds. You have to know what the actual advance is to make an= y decision. Mark the flex plate or flywheel teeth with paint so you can ch= eck actual advance during any RPM.=0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> It is diffi= cult to detonate an NA engine. It is not difficult detonate a boosted engin= e.=0D
>> =0D
>> Lynn E. Hanover=0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> In a mes= sage dated 7/5/2019 10:22:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, flyrotary@lancaironl= ine.net writes:=0D
>> =0D
>> Steve,=0D
>> I=E2=80=99m running defa= ult timing or maybe 1 degree advanced. Early on I experimented with 1-2 deg= rees advance for many flight hours and did not detect any noticeable change= in engine performance. I did push the engine to what I believe was detonat= ion during a ground tuning session. I was tuning under boost (44=E2=80=9D M= P) , 7000 rpm with a wideband O2 on each runner and adjusting Mode 9 and Mo= de 4. With F/A balanced between each rotor and EGT=E2=80=99s under 1600F I = was trying to see if increasing timing would lower EGT=E2=80=99s. F/A was i= n the 11=E2=80=99s. This was at the end of the session and the engine and s= upercharger were already hot. I think I had added 4-5 degrees advance with = no noticeable EGT decrease when I encountered a mild bang or misfire. This = condition was well above my 38=E2=80=9D MP limit I sometimes use for takeof= f.=0D
>> =0D
>> I=E2=80=99m curious about the dwell time setting diff= erence between LS1 and LS2 coils. I switched to LS2 coils sometime back wit= h no failures to date. I remember seeing an option setting in some of the c= ode you or Finn posted. Internet research indicates LS2 coils require less = dwell time than LS1. Possibly 0.5-1 ms less.=0D
>> =0D
>> Bobby=0D>> =0D
>> Sent from my iPad=0D
>> =0D
>> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:= 58 AM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote:=0D
>> >=0D
>> > Hi there Guys=0D
>> >=0D
>> > Of the guy= s with Renesis engines using EC2/3 can you comment on your timing settings.= =0D
>> > I=E2=80=99ve to date left the timing at the default setting fig= uring its set by the location of the CAS.=0D
>> > Not sure if the variou= s coil options have different trigger timing latency.=0D
>> >=0D
>> >= Thanks=0D
>> >=0D
>> > Steve Izett=0D
>> >=0D
>> >=0D
>> >= =0D
>> >=0D
>> > --=0D
>> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/= =0D
>> > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyr= otary/List.html=0D
>> =0D
>> --=0D
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrot= ary.com/=0D
>> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/list= s/flyrotary/List.html=0D
=0D
=0D
--=0D
Homepage: http://www.fl= yrotary.com/=0D
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/li= sts/flyrotary/List.html=0D
------=_NextPart_16005762.849680526277--