X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ebpDgIMH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0Q1YK9O9zG3sl5SEd3PLog==:117 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=xXDCcK6TKBsA:10 a=CFTnQlWoA9kA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=HLElNSDFAAAA:8 a=_6GpL_ENAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=uYH-AUHyAW6LY1t_y50A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=izEWSWqvyK8A:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=DI_y_Pkr2nIhtqjIOdcA:9 a=J1GRDhb5WNHc29g0:21 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=NTybjnMHmzLOwcLJc94Q:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Todd Bartrim bartrim@gmail.com" Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.11) with ESMTPS id 12233566 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:06:44 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.208.47; envelope-from=bartrim@gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id x7so9330526eds.8 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:06:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e1Py9ksjZIn5DQBB1VRCF2yk43mTAGIBUKixmDcDVs8=; b=k4bCKIBnnucrnCV3mkNEe5fGGtrb+5lQibgzwFMrR0xAKLdr24nNuf5nm/dCuyU+AI jc28dF4Ppejd+glUrXWCNpOt8EQM3e67CFLNlxe5GSYOf28nFttdk9JccdG0eSP6KceW L1/pfkbtALNqTxG7HV8MZ/NUYxl7WSDDRBGp2UZQdLyVY+zKxPPXKh4J+G2syPuLbaoJ SBPaDajBMwzydmi3qiPdWokuvUgmCME09WIceiHgjHon9sospk8TIhdvZas4GKBgazZS GBflQtd87e+ndTQLS6Uj/bMvj3tpeciJIwGnwsA2dPNO+5GO96XzRmlaTbwnX+AlnckU NN8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=e1Py9ksjZIn5DQBB1VRCF2yk43mTAGIBUKixmDcDVs8=; b=ucXvqYZqAKgaitG4fVpzXYP2ngjDYrrdQw2zR3O1bu9LPqCAHRwCSS74mpwvijhyrq eWG+sDUQXQd+GfkhYf8DmWcEBQNKhArmCaEBEYed9BAptfzfzdJAXhv1rtmr1VRl72su zwxQZz4K/cDLRPRikFPYhdtHZxCfnVsZGWzEPShsjREOaYhMryTfURwMxiaFC8HThcpT pnYxRS445LX2RzqD8JoOPFukeGo1vD+MZmgCPqqRTvlvZi2OZWgJGQIX03GFMFzYIQM3 Qdq8u3xgRzOO3Pq4HTjj9LQ+pn+UigTz2lrxxW5wnNQQZW3F8FvWtOKep/JmGQvI74SB L1Og== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaqHQFXfCiHU2xohZyXlkY2LO/2Ft+q38vYF+FqXuH5zaMYpXBL y7M8iXc1HOfgWBHbG7NRKMr5Yva3yksuhv714geZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZMFnE/vmzJqzCtbblUeiKoHsZhWHrDtLXckEezGeY51srwkC8dfOZepvaolns7aqs0tO5bVFG6H062tvqqQWU= X-Received: by 2002:a50:8529:: with SMTP id 38mr6990607edr.161.1550279186358; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:06:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:06:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] new option for injection pumps To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000034a82a0581f88067" --00000000000034a82a0581f88067 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Charlie; This is good for new builders and others having to do rebuild or a redesign, but I'd like to add my 2-bits for the benefit of any new builders that are still early in the construction phase. I would seriously investigate the possibility of using an in-tank pump in each tank. Especially if you are considering auxiliary tanks. My desire to have inboard, outboard and tip tanks on each wing, caused untold amounts of complexity in valving arrangements. I really wish I'd at least considered in-tank pumps, but at the time I wanted to use the same in-line pumps that everyone else was using successfully. Another factor in my reluctance to use the in-tank pump was that at the time they still required a return line that would have to be managed, but today's in-tank pumps are usually returnless with the regulator built into the pump. I can't say much more about them as I haven't investigated any more in depth but I would encourage new builders to further explore the possibilities of these as well as the one you mentioned. Todd On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 16:35 Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com, < flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote: > Hi guys, > > One of the things that drove me to add a 2nd alternator to my install is > the relatively high current draw of the 'standard' Walbro GSL393 fuel > pump (around 6A). I looked at using the little turbine pumps (around > 3--4A), but they must be inside the tank(s) since they cannot self prime. > > Over on the VAF (RV-x) forum, there's a guy who's using the typical > Bendix style injection on his Lyc, but wants to eliminate the engine > driven pump. He's also (drastically) over- (and incorrectly) thinking > that what's already available isn't safe, so he's embarked on his own > research. Fortuitously, he turned up something that could be useful to > us. Turns out that Walbro makes a smaller gerotor pump, that can supply > 30 GPH (instead of 60), and only draws around 2.5A. Model is GSL414; a > bit harder to find, but roughly the same $ as the 393. If I hadn't > already done the alternator work and bought the pumps, I'd be giving > this a serious look. > > Here's his testing thread, if anyone's interested. > > http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=168793 > > Charlie > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > --00000000000034a82a0581f88067 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Charlie;=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0This is good for new builde= rs and others having to do=C2=A0 rebuild or a redesign, but I'd like to= add my 2-bits for the benefit of any new builders that are still early in = the construction phase.
=C2=A0 I would seriously investigate the = possibility of using an in-tank pump in each tank. Especially if you are co= nsidering auxiliary tanks. My desire to have inboard, outboard and tip tank= s on each wing, caused untold amounts of complexity in valving arrangements= .=C2=A0
I really wish I'd at least considered in-tank pumps, = but at the time I wanted to use the same in-line pumps that everyone else w= as using successfully.=C2=A0
=C2=A0 Another factor in my reluctan= ce to use the in-tank pump was that at the time they still required a retur= n line that would have to be managed, but today's in-tank pumps are usu= ally returnless with the regulator built into the pump.
=C2=A0 I = can't say much more about them as I haven't investigated any more i= n depth but I would encourage new builders to further explore the possibili= ties of these as well as the one you mentioned.=C2=A0

<= div>Todd

On Fri, = Feb 15, 2019, 16:35 Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com, <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
Hi guys,

One of the things that drove me to add a 2nd alternator to my install is the relatively high current draw of the 'standard' Walbro GSL393 fu= el
pump (around 6A). I looked at using the little turbine pumps (around
3--4A), but they must be inside the tank(s) since they cannot self prime.
Over on the VAF (RV-x) forum, there's a guy who's using the typical=
Bendix style injection on his Lyc, but wants to eliminate the engine
driven pump. He's also (drastically) over- (and incorrectly) thinking <= br> that what's already available isn't safe, so he's embarked on h= is own
research. Fortuitously, he turned up something that could be useful to
us. Turns out that Walbro makes a smaller gerotor pump, that can supply 30 GPH (instead of 60), and only draws around 2.5A. Model is GSL414; a
bit harder to find, but roughly the same $ as the 393. If I hadn't
already done the alternator work and bought the pumps, I'd be giving this a serious look.

Here's his testing thread, if anyone's interested.

http://www.vansairforce.com/community= /showthread.php?t=3D168793

Charlie


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
Homepage:=C2=A0 http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:=C2=A0 =C2=A0http://mail= .lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--00000000000034a82a0581f88067--