Tracy
and Neil,
In
order to prove to myself that the RPM is
divided between the stacked thrust bearings,
I installed a Hall effect sensor in the
mounting plate and silver brazed triggers to
the middle thrust washer. An inductive
pickup was installed to monitor the rotation
of the flexplate (input shaft). This
allowed the determination of the input shaft
RPM as well as the middle washer RPM under
various conditions. The load on the drive
was from a 3 blade 72" dia Warp drive prop
with the tip angle set to 20 degrees.
All
new bearing components as used in the -C
drive were tested along with a used cupped
middle thrust washer from a C6
transmission. The cupped thrust washer was
tested because it was possible that the cup
overlapping the 3.5mm shaft side thrust
washer would prevent the middle washer from
contacting and causing wear of the input
shaft. After seeing the results from the
used cupped washer, new cupped washers were
obtained and tested also.
In
the course of testing the thrust bearing
configurations, it was found that the
reduction drive always operates completely
filled with oil. The added triggers may
have affected the behavior of the bearing
stack due to drag between them and the
surrounding oil. To see if this was the
case, the drive was modified such that the
drive contained about 5 to 6 oz of oil
during operation rather than the about 20 oz
of oil when completely filled.
The
results are shown in the attached plots.
These
results indicate that, with all new
components including a new flat middle
washer, the RPM was reasonably well divided
between the two thrust bearings and affected
little by the amount of oil in the gearbox.
With the used cupped middle thrust washer,
essentially all the RPM was seen by the
mounting plate side bearing. With the new
cupped middle thrust washer, the RPM
distribution between the thrust bearings was
affected by engine RPM when the gearbox was
completely oil filled but little affected by
RPM when the gearbox was drained.
All
the results were obtained with an input
shaft that didn't have a groove worn in it
by the middle thrust washer.
My
conclusion is that with all new bearing
components and unworn shaft the system
behaves as desired. With used components,
the behavior is unknown. The cupped thrust
washer is not a solution to the shaft wear
issue because of the uneven RPM distribution
when submerged in oil and since shaft wear
has resulted from the bearing cages as well
as the middle washer.
The
internal gearbox pressure with -6 drain
lines was about 4 psi when cold and about 2
psi when warm which may have implications in
terms of input seal leakage and the seal
coming out of its bore. The completely oil
filled gearbox consumes extra power which is
converted to heat but apparently not so much
as to cause serious problems.
All
the above are simply results of my
curiosity. You are most welcome to draw
your own conclusions.
Steve
Boese