X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=L4JfeKb8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=scT8ahpoMGExUirXO6bvuw==:117 a=2J0hlURz4D+EIULnUSUy3A==:17 a=WhYfPglTnXwA:10 a=CQbpi0b-i3wA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=e8BSqymJ620A:10 a=smKx5t2vBNcA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=ga2y08a2TYPpY8k9RFAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=nDiB4oq6DFjoZdXZ:21 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 From: " argoldman@aol.com" Received: from omr-a020e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.8) with ESMTPS id 11822741 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:42:55 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.29.186.66; envelope-from=argoldman@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mcd01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mcd01.mx.aol.com [172.26.223.207]) by omr-a020e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id AA380380008D for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-abb04g.mail.aol.com (core-abb04.mail.aol.com [172.27.0.4]) by mtaomg-mcd01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 8479A38000082 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 23.25.33.118 by webjas-vaa148.srv.aolmail.net (10.96.33.151) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:42:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:42:39 -0400 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message-Id: <166c611fb96-1ec3-7cbb@webjas-vaa148.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Flexplate replacement MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_43366_1268963751.1540921359254" X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS DWEB X-Originating-IP: [23.25.33.118] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1540921359; bh=keCJjz7GJwauzrRXCaQYL418jTE13BMHx3SZisFcYmI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OlJFwKg5NfyFtau/YL7qDnksNl71WhJ7KbWkOTPyIVEMmmtZRE1SrLkwMWIDr1y4S RvhNUZAhRqfgPPxBC0bJJstDhYcwZPleIyC9gf28XCEMKSLeG+k4AfJ8gASNraUn/x azaJgBSgT8mAho+qaOv4ml0Y67c7dRyDxwa/tYBw= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adfcf5bd8980f3df0 ------=_Part_43366_1268963751.1540921359254 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe, =C2=A0 I am a little concerned with this approach-- not that it won'd work but ad= ding material with all kinds of different coefficients with the hope of str= engthening may possibly have the opposite effect. For example adding carbon= to fiberglass has the problem that in the failure mode, when one of the su= bstrates gives out, it transfers an instant load to the other with sometime= s catastrophic results, which might not have been seen with the failure mod= e of one of the substrates by itself. =C2=A0 Not knowing much about this, I sure would like to have a real engineer do a= n evaluation of the addition of the carbon. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Rich In a message dated 10/30/2018 12:31:55 PM Central Standard Time, flyrotary@= lancaironline.net writes: =C2=A0 I have tried to search the archives and found part of the story. I=C2=A0 think it will take a while to find all of the emails. Found pics of Dave=E2=80=99s broken flexplate. The pics of Dave=E2=80=99s flywheel are very disturbing.=C2=A0 It appears that the destructive stresses occur between the counterweight bo= lt circle and the torsional damper bolt circle.=C2=A0 If a good flexplate could be modified to strengthen the areas could this be= a fix? Clean the flexplate =C2=A0in the area of the bolt circles and perform a lay= up of carbon fiber on both sides. A layer of Eglass would be placed between the carbon and steel flexplate to= prevent galvanic reaction. The mounting plate for the RD-1C would have to be shimmed the thickness of = the carbon fiber. Has anyone thought about this? Joe Berki ------=_Part_43366_1268963751.1540921359254 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Joe,

I am a little concerned with this approach-- not that it won'd work but adding material with all kinds of different coefficients with the hope of strengthening may possibly have the opposite effect. For example adding carbon to fiberglass has the problem that in the failure mode, when one of the substrates gives out, it transfers an instant load to the other with sometimes catastrophic results, which might not have been seen with the failure mode of one of the substrates by itself.

Not knowing much about this, I sure would like to have a real engineer do an evaluation of the addition of the carbon.


Rich
In a message dated 10/30/2018 12:31:55 PM Central Standard Time, flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:

I have tried to search the archives and found part of the story.

I  think it will take a while to find all of the emails.

Found pics of Dave’s broken flexplate.

The pics of Dave’s flywheel are very disturbing. 

It appears that the destructive stresses occur between the counterweight bolt circle and the torsional damper bolt circle. 

If a good flexplate could be modified to strengthen the areas could this be a fix?

Clean the flexplate  in the area of the bolt circles and perform a layup of carbon fiber on both sides.

A layer of Eglass would be placed between the carbon and steel flexplate to prevent galvanic reaction.

The mounting plate for the RD-1C would have to be shimmed the thickness of the carbon fiber.

Has anyone thought about this?

Joe Berki

------=_Part_43366_1268963751.1540921359254--