X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HLeBLclv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=dIavB+HnD6SO0Y3oYPq1Pg==:117 a=55z/sxGcUIPVrBMYBb4HRw==:17 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=_Z_nqdSeG58A:10 a=7mUfYlMuFuIA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=eRLigfuSAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=Y6zwMAtDQkKQLEoLl2UA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=4PR2P7QzAAAA:8 a=pZw_m12sjde0VxmJ--IA:9 a=Htc2SOEOtrFNjb8L:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=BfhXYjFvZD4iae-mNffo:22 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=4dqwQCo7Po2mVW515mGf:22 From: "Neil Unger 12348ung@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.5) with ESMTPS id 11288184 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:51:52 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.180; envelope-from=12348ung@gmail.com Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so2535606pfn.4 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=thkVmg09t3JTljRtmCwcE5ZhhS4LHv10g/EsXt8U7gs=; b=WMBbb4eaqtTN8R6LFVqyoJ9p1Eype+9gYLxH0aUqgSucjeIhRrlp2Q2aUNt4wGSeiP BGB4MCz2KWv9PHo9GABLnGaKKeYjSf2AuVOYZa4feyexqPLVQ5A0RsmaMWpYkqwUMk+4 BWCQXxzwukZ3Kc+GbvI0m1W59k9rBcxZS1DHU8boHK8EZNnE4gNVJXIZM5tRILRIfavY eRrmhSD011FwYZrUGgFBisAd4KtuapwQ4euftfJkntgfzkWiPx/nZZ8cmZLjEWkO1dt3 plh4+Cf4M/GLNL9o5oudFRCzwy0edHggdq8ahPYppkKYqD9UkHNvnEcSXj4g8svkWKzD 04uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=thkVmg09t3JTljRtmCwcE5ZhhS4LHv10g/EsXt8U7gs=; b=T2ZQjfKhmbguhRCWw1CBp6SnTlSJt9LYhESWGw0XhzWfeWZ/V/UXoX0/NwSrXwdOqL yPDeFOEHf3NxVLKtXoyhyLJXUGxBCW23Kn7PCWnVVCqhVA5OLyM5mwf/eZdvVOtutlpW wBVzE9j3FkztGCqd8iJkhjAyoi+3hndXz66D8NnVTv9Z09gBnj+tkyO88bVZL8dmfFsZ CKP9z4JBj3KH84/9FgdfRkShR+4lDtJfiHKTZW4QFSc6i0KImIi5xzGPZ523X51fCx5H 51ieaL6t+ZmLbyDOHimpcxznwmFaPRobtUARUPftdC2CcwS3eMZT/In26A45kNaGF26p KmVw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1k4aKYSsE99PaAs+qpXxzFWMiIQa4/l3fW3y6RviDvjGhmO8Tn V5Umz1BdN1MYT7Q6HoMMW74kuR6g X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK18g8TRll3GQ1jLNwN9R56oBr90InocGIqwkZWuTPBr1CDAHqHzD3rTRdcaqp2+pbv4+/zyA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:715d:: with SMTP id b29-v6mr25234637pgn.325.1529639495139; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <12348ung@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([103.198.24.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s19-v6sm13082549pfe.97.2018.06.21.20.51.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Oil cooler thermostat To: Rotary motors in aircraft References: Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:51:30 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B44903889D52603F09F159C9" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------B44903889D52603F09F159C9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Andrew,  Try "power with racing" (PWR) in Brisbane who specialise in rads.  Dear but good,  Neil. On 6/22/2018 12:31 PM, Andrew Martin andrew@martinag.com.au wrote: > Ok, I am in just a bit warmer climate than you, winter solstice > yesterday and its a sunny 22c today. > I can not see any reason to have an oil thermostat, at least here in > Australia, with stock 20b cooler I could only use about 50% power > before cooking the oil with a 13b. > Can't really comment about flying with cold oil. I would count that as > a total victory if ever in that situation. > Aftermarket remote oil thermostats are available if you need one in > the system. > I tried a 75mm thick aircond condenser as I had a couple of new ones > that were originally going to be used for coolant, better but not good > enough. still seeing 235-240f on partial throttle takeoffs, 175f on > descent. no thermostat, but possibly too much internal restriction as > predicted by Steve B. > This weekends project is to add more sensors before cooler just to > possibly confirm the inevitable need to purchase & import a fluidyne. > local cooler mfrs have been absolutely no help. > Andrew. > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Todd Bartrim bartrim@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Some (most?) Of you are using custom or at least aftermarket oil > coolers but I think there are a few like me that are using stock > oil coolers. How many have removed the thermostat and plugged the > bypass hole? > Do any of the non-stock coolers have a thermostat? > A Google search on the subject shows that on the RX7 forums it > seems to be generally accepted to leave it alone. >   But for our use I'm less inclined to think we always need it and > it seems to be quite restrictive. >   Of those flying without one in either stock or non-stock, how > many are flying in warm climates only? Anybody in cold? Jeff? >   I'm just concerned about winter flying especially during a long > descent where it might cool excessively and then if I was required > to use sudden power for a missed approach, would that cold oil be > a problem? > > Todd > > --------------B44903889D52603F09F159C9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Andrew,  Try "power with racing" (PWR) in Brisbane who specialise in rads.  Dear but good,  Neil.


On 6/22/2018 12:31 PM, Andrew Martin andrew@martinag.com.au wrote:
Ok, I am in just a bit warmer climate than you, winter solstice yesterday and its a sunny 22c today.
I can not see any reason to have an oil thermostat, at least here in Australia, with stock 20b cooler I could only use about 50% power before cooking the oil with a 13b.
Can't really comment about flying with cold oil. I would count that as a total victory if ever in that situation.
Aftermarket remote oil thermostats are available if you need one in the system.
I tried a 75mm thick aircond condenser as I had a couple of new ones that were originally going to be used for coolant, better but not good enough. still seeing 235-240f on partial throttle takeoffs, 175f on descent. no thermostat, but possibly too much internal restriction as predicted by Steve B.
This weekends project is to add more sensors before cooler just to possibly confirm the inevitable need to purchase & import a fluidyne. local cooler mfrs have been absolutely no help.
Andrew.




On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Todd Bartrim bartrim@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
Some (most?) Of you are using custom or at least aftermarket oil coolers but I think there are a few like me that are using stock oil coolers. How many have removed the thermostat and plugged the bypass hole?
Do any of the non-stock coolers have a thermostat? 
A Google search on the subject shows that on the RX7 forums it seems to be generally accepted to leave it alone.
  But for our use I'm less inclined to think we always need it and it seems to be quite restrictive. 
  Of those flying without one in either stock or non-stock, how many are flying in warm climates only? Anybody in cold? Jeff? 
  I'm just concerned about winter flying especially during a long descent where it might cool excessively and then if I was required to use sudden power for a missed approach, would that cold oil be a problem? 

Todd 


--------------B44903889D52603F09F159C9--