Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3072565 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:51 -0500 Received: from [65.2.11.93] by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040310162951.FNLK2496.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[65.2.11.93]> for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:51 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] marvel mystery oil? From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3161762978_43966056" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3161762978_43966056 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 3/10/04 10:46 AM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Greetings, > =20 > Is anyone still using MMO for their fuel additive? I think Tracy used it= for > a while, but I'm not sure if he still does. Is there a consensus of whet= her > this stuff will do the job for us? I add an extra 4 oz of it to the RX-7= tank > at every fill, but that doesn't prove much. > =20 > The reason I ask, is that I've been using a "normal" TC-3 type oil in the > plane. I've had a problem getting it to mix well, and it sometimes wants= to > just sit in the low part of the tank. I'm sure I can shake, slosh, etc t= he > plane around enough to get it to mix, but I'd rather find something that = is > thinner, and will stay in solution better. It just seems like MMO would > satisfy that requirement. > =20 > Thanks, > Rusty=20 >=20 Rusty, Paul Lamar conducted a oil burning test to see how much =B3sludge=B2 is left after burning out. Turned out 2 cycle oil was the best MMO was not that good for this application. Bulent --B_3161762978_43966056 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] marvel mystery oil? On 3/10/04 10:46 AM, &q= uot;Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Greetings,
Is anyone still using MMO for their fuel additive= ?  I think Tracy used it for a while, but I'm not sure if he still does= .  Is there a consensus of whether this stuff will do the job for us? &= nbsp;I add an extra 4 oz of it to the RX-7 tank at every fill, but that does= n't prove much.  
The reason I ask, is that I've been using a "= ;normal" TC-3 type oil in the plane.  I've had a problem getting i= t to mix well, and it sometimes wants to just sit in the low part of the tan= k.  I'm sure I can shake, slosh, etc the plane around enough to get it = to mix, but I'd rather find something that is thinner, and will stay in solu= tion better.  It just seems like MMO would satisfy that requirement. &n= bsp;
Thanks,
Rusty


Rusty, Paul Lamar conducted a oil burning test to see how much “sludg= e” is left after burning out.
Turned out 2 cycle oil was the best MMO was not that good for this applicat= ion.
Bulent --B_3161762978_43966056--