From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.181; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Issues
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:57:43 +0800
References: <list-10492771@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-10492771@logan.com>
Message-Id: <205A95FF-4727-421D-B0A4-E4FB67B9605E@gmail.com>

Hi there again Lynn

You were concerned with the oil cooler inlet.
It is an RX7 turbo cooler of (11 x 8.75 x 2 in) 193 in^3 fed by I think =
a good diffuser and 7.4 in^2 inlet as you saw.
What is your gut telling you?

Steve


> On 30 Dec 2017, at 4:56 am, Steven W. Boese SBoese@uwyo.edu =
<flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>=20
> Steve,
>=20
> The attached plot shows the interaction between coolant and oil =
temperatures obtained on my test stand.  The oil cooler and the radiator =
are fed air from separate ducts and their outlet areas are independently =
variable.  RPM was 4000 and HP was 42 during the test.  Water T is the =
temperature of the coolant coming out of the engine and Oil T is oil =
temperature returning to the engine from the oil cooler.  With those =
temperatures stabilized at about 210 deg, the air delta P was 2.6 inches =
of water across the radiator and the oil cooler cores.
>=20
> After the air flow through the oil cooler was increased while leaving =
the radiator air flow unchanged, the Oil T dropped from 212 to 160 deg =
while the Water T dropped from 212 to 200 deg.  At this time, the oil =
cooler oil delta T was 33 deg  and the radiator water delta T was 15 =
deg.
>=20
> My conclusion from this is that it will be difficult to cause a =
significant change in the coolant operating temperature by making =
changes to the oil cooling part of the system.  In real life, I was a =
scientist.  It may be useful to run this conclusion past an engineer.  =
Scientists just collect data while engineers figure out what the data =
means and how make use of it.
>=20
> =46rom the photo of the front of the radiator inlet duct, comparing =
the inlet to the prop flange, it would appear that the duct inlet has an =
area of around 27 sq in.  Your previous information indicates an inlet =
area of 16.5 sq in which may be the area of the inlet through the cowl.  =
What sort of interface do you have between the cowl and duct?
>=20
> Steve Boese
> RV6A, 1986 13B NA, RD1A, EC2
>=20
> From: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> on =
behalf of Stephen Izett =
stephen.izett@gmail.com<flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 12:42:29 AM
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Issues
> =20
> Hi Lynn
> Current testing is stationary.
>=20
> I have had it on the apron doing figure 8=E2=80=99s and it seemed to =
not overheat.=20
> Still to hot though.
>=20
> Once its moving it seems to help with airflow.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m not going to give up on our setup just yet.
> I=E2=80=99ve got a few ideas and a bunch of testing and then maybe fly =
it and see what it does with some wind in its face.
>=20
> What delta T=E2=80=99s should I expect from the oiling water coolers?
> Sounds like 15F on the water and a fair bit more on the oil?
>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> Steve Izett
> <oil and coolant temperature interaction.jpg>--
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html