X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=aM2ykv1m c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=rxAKiTD8bQmauZVlwM9vwA==:117 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=xXDCcK6TKBsA:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=l8HhWy2vwPXMa8HwYDQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Prtlg98VdaGO5F5B8iIA:9 a=OiRowflAF7XSMAWN:21 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 From: "Todd Bartrim" Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2c3) with ESMTPS id 10036535 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:41:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.82.54; envelope-from=bartrim@gmail.com Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b189so4217774wmd.0 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:41:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xMt3A1q47GCh9lq7msS9rTnX14QHGsNGQZ1KM/kGdyg=; b=JB0tMetOgoLc8XMf7fHsMTnNmiUiVhAUM/dHOjsfA/oTNa606Yvq0KGmCuH0XUbwg2 QWkvsPnr88UDvjFu/9uEv7eIHk2/M30kx30uBU//gu8F9Cg3I4o0JTUnjKDH3K+Z/GaA NrZAv3oFJh1fZx7/RqR47hFPrvEGio/WjBCp+2KUoWdIDgUD6pOtfgT39/1D0zzLPL5w 34sd5IkElX6ES5RO0eCaFW3BV7AboF3Kf9qcEi2m2M6MDEfLvZJU7qvCRid95shx1A6V 8ZkRBoEHStsaqjug3Zpwt6oPhRB40LiWSIRAzD3NkZd0/C49tCoi64zffLBolBR0qc5T ReVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xMt3A1q47GCh9lq7msS9rTnX14QHGsNGQZ1KM/kGdyg=; b=BjhHMrNJm0EE32u973raiVgnX6hSMie9ULICmrWiNV6GFn3tIBpHhMZ2b0vBmF657M oXROGGiYmBEc+QxaBroa1eD4gszLRuUoHYpB+RsVplOoF3Yupi20eM60bOmscyoW4k5n Q2Fp0d6Es13ajCrJAXfp1HSIHUOz2QVqHyrZy2AD9FJnZiI0v+MRXT8NegMke3VTVUd/ nyQRw6nEXXOUM4+i8OWiobRTU+ZcF/GXOQyZsTp8KdETasJXozAPdq64huNHAFvcyKFo vVkavqMWWuizVhOZQC6rWcZwGZBLXvxRHRImH8ZrmYMGXB2WR6qMFUscBsaMFByiChBG yugA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j33AE899DaqFUIwDH0QYkNl7LRzBn2zsNqTUlkRwy5gc26gdR1 dn2RPaouB/DWpXbsXvl+nhO/IhMPug== X-Received: by 10.80.178.37 with SMTP id o34mr873658edd.201.1503427287369; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:41:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.169.134 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:41:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:41:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Eclipse Viewing (not rotary related) To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1947a268e8fa05575bf109" --94eb2c1947a268e8fa05575bf109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yeah, I've always accepted that whole risk/reward stuff, but at the beginning of summer I submerged/destroyed a $1200 D7200, that Nikon was not able to fix. So I replaced it with a $2800 D500. I find myself holding this one with a much tighter grip. The Contour POV cam, I'm a little less worried about, but I'd still not like to lose it. I really like the shot that Doug shared that was mounted on the VS. Todd Todd Bartrim On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Thomas Mann wrote: > >I wouldn't have trusted a suction cup to hold it. I'm surprised that it > would hold for an entire flight, through pressure and temperature changes. > I wouldn't have bet a $300 camera on it. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > I felt that way the first time I tried it but after many flights I have > come to trust it. > I take a wet paper towel in a zip lock with me so I can be sure the area > is clean prior to attaching it. > > When my plane is flying, the mounts will be substantially stronger. > > There is always risk associated with reward. I was wondering if perhaps I > was flying into a hornets nest of traffic as I was entering the eclipse > corridor but it all worked out. > >> >> > --94eb2c1947a268e8fa05575bf109 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah, I've always accepted that whole risk/reward stuf= f, but at the beginning of summer I submerged/destroyed a $1200 D7200, that= Nikon was not able to fix. So I replaced it with a $2800 D500. I find myse= lf holding this one with a much tighter grip. The Contour POV cam, I'm = a little less worried about, but I'd still not like to lose it.
I r= eally like the shot that Doug shared that was mounted on the VS.
=
Todd

Todd Bartrim

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Thomas Man= n <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>I wouldn't hav= e trusted a suction cup to hold it. I'm surprised that it would hold fo= r an entire flight, through pressure and temperature changes. I wouldn'= t have bet a $300 camera on it.
__________________________________________________________= ____________
=C2=A0
I felt that way the first time I tried it but after many flights I hav= e come to trust it.
I take a wet paper towel in a zip lock with me so I can be sure the ar= ea is clean prior to attaching it.
=C2=A0
When my plane is flying, the mounts will be substantially stronger.
=C2=A0
There is always risk associated with reward. I was wondering if perhap= s I was flying into a hornets nest of traffic as I was entering the eclipse= corridor but it all worked out.=C2=A0
=C2=A0

--94eb2c1947a268e8fa05575bf109--