X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "A R Goldman" Received: from omr-a020e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2c3) with ESMTPS id 9832407 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 01:10:52 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.29.186.66; envelope-from=argoldman@aol.com Received: from mtaout-mac01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mac01.mx.aol.com [172.26.222.205]) by omr-a020e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 22BB33800040 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 01:10:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (c-73-22-163-56.hsd1.il.comcast.net [73.22.163.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mac01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id E7CF138000084 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 01:10:33 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 00:10:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Jet-Hot Ceramic Coating Message-Id: <7DFE6BC5-3CD1-40F7-85D5-2D35F5795AD8@aol.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14F89) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1497676234; bh=r02kSYM3gG6llyKAhDxRdEJBXjihcmzTE5LN9B6xZxc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=fgbZeuJKNjTyyPlK1+h4ZryG0jJsOkfCX2btxS4HJ/sK5DJthnmiwViHO6xaO4O7z UVs/SfNEnMbYMmz7trDZL/sXBjZUf0Gv6V56+jim3QROuscjJfTBbvlDkWD69Lj0FJ FC07NfkcU/rt+2W3eJv/Y3fVUyHo+keG8cHa7tLg= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adecd5944b9c92148 X-AOL-IP: 73.22.163.56 So this begs the question (at least to me) if we have a muffler in line whic= h you really can't coat in and out, will coating the header cause an increas= e in thermal wear of the muffler since the exhaust gas will be hotter? Rich Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 16, 2017, at 11:58 PM, Doug Lomheim w= rote: >=20 > Doug =20