X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Doug Lomheim" Received: from omr-m007e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2c3) with ESMTPS id 9832405 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 00:59:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.29.186.9; envelope-from=dlomheim@aol.com Received: from mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.78]) by omr-m007e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 38A0538000AF for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 00:58:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (x590c18ed.dyn.telefonica.de [89.12.24.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 900C038000081 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 00:58:54 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D17BFFD3-2FCF-4716-B1B4-E2C111B15E8C" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Jet-Hot Ceramic Coating Message-Id: Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 06:58:52 +0200 To: Rotary Motors in Aircraft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1497675535; bh=wuck8Iu/QzXoWAwl5oEZXMFlrhBYzP48twIKbNp+uSs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=unhkRcOqzmVUCi8mqrDm8FsQtEukGpQ1Z7iGttIYRDQLW/pYRO7uqFInxeSnSXhq2 TAj+BfMVT95pDqRYJfBxFlJU4zfF1IBEalX0s7USSI01SnDkZtlKWfsDs85UD1BNvI xXAQytQWujDfRXoYfEc8oMYr26ldpdcBSUh0isaA= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add4e5944b70e32bf X-AOL-IP: 89.12.24.237 --Apple-Mail=_D17BFFD3-2FCF-4716-B1B4-E2C111B15E8C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 So in summary it appears there is some benefit to applying =E2=80=9CJet = Hot=E2=80=9D to both the inside and outside of new headers from an under = cowling heat reduction point of view. =20 Back in the early to mid 2000=E2=80=99s, I seem to remember that some on = our list had experimented by having the rotors themselves shot with some = product; but that product wasn=E2=80=99t very durable, etc.? For some = reason my new MAC doesn=E2=80=99t want to perform an =E2=80=9Carchive = search=E2=80=9D for me=E2=80=A6 Doug =20= --Apple-Mail=_D17BFFD3-2FCF-4716-B1B4-E2C111B15E8C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 So in summary it appears there is = some benefit to applying =E2=80=9CJet Hot=E2=80=9D to both the = inside and outside of new headers from an under cowling heat reduction = point of view.

Back in the early to mid 2000=E2=80=99s, I seem to = remember that some on our list had experimented by having the = rotors themselves shot with some product; but that product wasn=E2=80=99t = very durable, etc.? For some reason my new MAC doesn=E2=80=99t = want to perform an =E2=80=9Carchive search=E2=80=9D for = me=E2=80=A6

Doug =

= --Apple-Mail=_D17BFFD3-2FCF-4716-B1B4-E2C111B15E8C--