From: "steve Izett" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.83.53; envelope-from=steveize@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternative Fuel Pump
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:47:49 +0800
References: <list-9611988@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-9611988@logan.com>
Message-Id: <613B828A-F85D-4BD0-A43A-58DEF6D1D776@gmail.com>

Thanks very much Jeff
Steve Izett
> On 27 Mar 2017, at 9:57 am, Jeff Whaley <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> Steve, I don't place a lot of confidence in the accuracy of my fuel =
pressure gauge as it's only 1.25 inch diameter - more of a yes there is =
fuel pressure indicator; however, with either the Airtex or the Walbro's =
I saw/see a few PSI change from (36-37) one pump on to both (39-40).
> With the Airtex I routinely would operate on one pump for cruise and =
two for take-off and landing.  With the Walbro"s I have been operating =
both pumps all the time; have checked one pump airborne and there is =
definitely a slight leaning.
> Have never actually measured current draw but as stated a few days ago =
I am using aircraft grade switched-breakers of 10 Amps for each pump.  =
Hope this helps.
> Jeff
> Sent from my BlackBerry=C2=AE phone powered by Koodo Mobile=C2=AE.
> This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for =
the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. =
Any unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received =
this message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may =
correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message. =
Thank you.
>=20
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html