From: "Jeff Whaley" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.225.166.171; envelope-from=jwhaley@datacast.com
To: "flyrotary@lancaironline.net" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Alternative Fuel Pump
Thread-Topic: Alternative Fuel Pump
Thread-Index: AQHSpp2JwHl1OWOChU67BL65S0ru/Q==
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 01:57:49 +0000
Message-ID: <640190407.19592.1490579868175.JavaMail.rim@b14.c1.bise6.blackberry>
Reply-To: Jeff Whaley <jwhaley@datacast.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <3F5C02586EE2F543865C9A3F5AFE1ED3@exch026.domain.local>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Steve, I don't place a lot of confidence in the accuracy of my fuel pressur=
e gauge as it's only 1.25 inch diameter - more of a yes there is fuel press=
ure indicator; however, with either the Airtex or the Walbro's I saw/see a =
few PSI change from (36-37) one pump on to both (39-40).
With the Airtex I routinely would operate on one pump for cruise and two fo=
r take-off and landing.  With the Walbro"s I have been operating both pumps=
 all the time; have checked one pump airborne and there is definitely a sli=
ght leaning.
Have never actually measured current draw but as stated a few days ago I am=
 using aircraft grade switched-breakers of 10 Amps for each pump.  Hope thi=
s helps.
Jeff
Sent from my BlackBerry=AE phone powered by Koodo Mobile=AE.
This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for the a=
ddressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauth=
orized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message=
 in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our internal=
 records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you.