Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:10:36 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1890558@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <cowcam@pipcom.com>
Received: from bree.pipcom.com ([204.92.62.3] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2)
  with SMTP id 1890555 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:09:11 -0500
Received: (qmail 12575 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 14:09:10 -0000
Received: from ras3-39.pipcom.com (HELO new) (204.92.62.171)
  by bree.pipcom.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 14:09:10 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <002701c296e7$7ea8d200$5ed9fea9@new>
From: "Peter Cowan" <cowcam@pipcom.com>
X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1890429@logan.com>
Subject: Re: Coolant loss : More cooling system test stuff.
X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:06:49 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

.Tracy and others, what is the theory behind so much liquid in the external
expansion tank? Thermal expansion of the initial coolant volume doesn't
account for such a large overflow. So is vapor building up inside? If it is
there is no longer a liquid filled system. I don't get it.
Peter