Return-Path: <squiggles@yahoo.com>
Received: from cic-omail3.wachovia.com ([169.200.164.164] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2997536 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:01:29 -0500
Received: from clt-dmz-cic-cache1.io.firstunion.com (cic-cache01.io.firstunion.com [169.200.25.90])
	by cic-omail3.wachovia.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.0) with ESMTP id i1IJ0t921318
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:00:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yahoo.com (S4DEV00018.cic.nc.fub.com [172.1.95.240])
	by clt-dmz-cic-cache1.io.firstunion.com (8.10.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id i1IJ0su14584
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:00:54 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4033B4E1.7080000@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:54:25 -0500
From: Scott Stout <squiggles@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: squiggles@yahoo.com
Organization: The Stout's Zenith 801
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Subject: Stock Oil Pickup
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If the stock oil pan is used, is there a reason not to use the stock oil 
pickup? 

Also, I had read in Tracy's papers about the need to slow down the 
return of the oil to the pan to reduce the amount of frothing( this was 
accomplished by the oil pan sandwich plate mounting method ).  Are the 
anti-frothing methods still believed to be needed?  If so, if the oil 
pan sandwich plate mounting method is not being used, any suggestions?

Thanx...
-Scott

Many thanx to those who helped with the pressure on a column of water...