X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTPS id 5726494 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:37:53 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so290054yen.25 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:37:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9wZlQFaoHSB1yi9iW883of0rUczPIdFd2W0oYUJpgB4=; b=lBB+I9ld8miZc59cgdorBJKrmK2qW7l41d3WLknkBuO8tPRSKkb+0/V2FBYoqXvFxB f0spWthyW/1rNl8LY+OS6gYm1lDtCgpb8hw0YmEKrrhZZ0CaVn6wkuIi/X7EZ+UT+nKe PUZjYgBuOt9PnWPIxtDkcJ/v4KICUwSRSDU5WzV8+8oIxpaDsaLfcyoax9bUpG6EUpEk yjVB/FvczB3J2C6SCfTBF85WtrGxB+o3WCy4joePvzBLoehHt8ldeBcqdS7TuRehHqzc KDgxloI+5+PcNPf/9TOyeVTv274KDEKtjqArdtkNII1pObwppANtz5KQD1dhPZbq1iTq 5geQ== Received: by 10.101.138.6 with SMTP id q6mr975278ann.87.1345772238458; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.5] (141.sub-70-193-205.myvzw.com. [70.193.205.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k22sm8436973ann.1.2012.08.23.18.37.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop revs References: From: Tracy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-79D6A023-218F-40CA-B8C8-7A30C2F95B74 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <57C1F7A3-88BE-4310-858B-E5EA074D9A21@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:37:06 -0400 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-79D6A023-218F-40CA-B8C8-7A30C2F95B74 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I'd start by dividing the current scale factor of FF channel by 3.75 , plug t= hat value in there and see if it looks right. I'll try it on the bench when I= get a chance. Tracy Sent from my iPad On Aug 23, 2012, at 5:30 PM, "Neil Unger" wrote: > Tracy, > Prop is a prince P tip, 70=E2=80=9D dia by 90=E2=80=9D pitch= . Any suggestions as to what numbers I can alter to convert US gal. to lit= res? Somehow I have to get the readings up 3.75 to get litres. Neil. > =20 > From: Tracy > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:17 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop revs > =20 > ONLY? 6300 is at the HIGH end of normal static. I would be more concern= ed about over Reving at top speed if this were a 200+ MPH plane. It will p= robably be about right for the glastar though. =20 > =20 > Be happy, celebrate! BTW, what are the numbers on that prop? L x P? > =20 > Tracy >=20 > Sent from my iPad >=20 > On Aug 20, 2012, at 9:48 PM, "Neil Unger" wrote: >=20 >> All, >> Looks like I am finally connected after many attempts.. I have a P= ported renesis in a glastar that is ready to fly. Tuning the motor yesterd= ay to find that I cannot get the motor revs over 6300. I suspected the prop= (prince fixed) is too big, but am assured that that is normal as a static l= oad. Lonnie suggests that once moving the extra revs will appear. How do I= tune the motor for the top end revs? Any advice? Neil. --Apple-Mail-79D6A023-218F-40CA-B8C8-7A30C2F95B74 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
I'd start by dividing the c= urrent scale factor of FF channel by 3.75 , plug that value in there and see= if it looks right. I'll try it on the bench when I get a chance.
=
Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 23, 2012,= at 5:30 PM, "Neil Unger" <neil= .unger@bigpond.com> wrote:

Tracy,
            = ;=20 Prop is a prince P tip,  70=E2=80=9D dia by 90=E2=80=9D pitch. &nb= sp; Any suggestions=20 as to what numbers I can alter to convert US gal. to litres?  Somehow I= =20 have to get the readings up 3.75 to get litres.    Neil.
 
From: Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 10:17 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop revs
 
ONLY?   6300 is at the HIGH end of normal static.  I wou= ld=20 be more concerned about over Reving at top speed if this were a 200+ MPH=20 plane.   It will probably be about right for the glastar=20 though.  
 
Be happy, celebrate!   BTW, what are the numbers on that=20 prop?  L x P?
 
Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 20, 2012, at 9:48 PM, "Neil Unger" <neil.unger@bigpond.com>=20 wrote:

All,
       Looks like I am finally connecte= d=20 after many attempts..  I have a P ported renesis in a glastar that is= =20 ready to fly.  Tuning the motor yesterday to find that I cannot get t= he=20 motor revs over 6300.  I suspected the prop (prince fixed) is too big= ,=20 but am assured that that is normal as a static load.  Lonnie suggests= =20 that once moving the extra revs will appear.  How do I tune the motor= for=20 the top end revs?  Any advice? =20 Neil.
= --Apple-Mail-79D6A023-218F-40CA-B8C8-7A30C2F95B74--