Return-Path: Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2989499 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:57 -0500 Received: from [68.214.35.192] by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040212215555.CTWF23866.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.214.35.192]> for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:55 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:55:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EFI Fuel Pressure From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/12/04 9:41 AM, "Scott Stout" wrote: > In a NA 13b setup, using the stock fuel pressure regulator what is the > pressure on the fuel rail? Is this the ideal pressure? > > Driving this question is I have to have to get fuel return fittings > welded to my tanks, well the highest point on the tank is not in the > easiest of spots to plumb to, thus I would like to return to a point > about half way down the tank. So, not only does the fuel have to be > pumped up 40" or so it also has to overcome 5gal or so of fuel weight > above the return fitting. External to the rotary lists, some of those > who I have floated the idea with have said the engine will run rich as > the fuel rail pressure will increase. However, it doesn't seem to make > sense to me as the pressure in the fuel rail will probably be higher, > much higher, than the pressure needed to overcome the push through the > return fuel line. > > What are your thoughts? > > Thank You. > > -Scott > http://home.att.net/~the_stouts_zenith_801/ > Scott, I would install a bent tube going up just under the top of the tank. This way you will avoid the backpressure of the fuel -- Bulent