X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTPS id 5612077 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:27:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,451,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="656999774" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2012 08:27:18 -0700 Received: from [10.62.16.167] (ernestc-laptop.hq.netapp.com [10.62.16.167]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q5LFRHFS002467 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE33D01.50309@att.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:25:53 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: simple and affordable datacollection References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill Bradburry wrote: > I need to look into that further Bobby. > > It seems cheaper. How much do I need a GPS?? I need to mount the camera on > the tie down at the tail of the plane and the shape of the Contour is more > "aerodynamic" than the GoPro. The mount also seems more stable, but I am > guessing at that. > Aerodynamic...now that is definitely something a smartphone will NOT do 8*)