Return-Path: Received: from cic-omail3.wachovia.com ([169.200.164.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2988901 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:42:42 -0500 Received: from clt-dmz-cic-cache2.io.firstunion.com (cic-cache02.io.firstunion.com [169.200.25.91]) by cic-omail3.wachovia.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.0) with ESMTP id i1CEge902305 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:42:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from yahoo.com (S4DEV00018.cic.nc.fub.com [172.1.95.240]) by clt-dmz-cic-cache2.io.firstunion.com (8.10.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id i1CEgeJ28345 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:42:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <402B907C.9030907@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:41:00 -0500 From: Scott Stout Reply-To: squiggles@yahoo.com Organization: The Stout's Zenith 801 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: EFI Fuel Pressure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a NA 13b setup, using the stock fuel pressure regulator what is the pressure on the fuel rail? Is this the ideal pressure? Driving this question is I have to have to get fuel return fittings welded to my tanks, well the highest point on the tank is not in the easiest of spots to plumb to, thus I would like to return to a point about half way down the tank. So, not only does the fuel have to be pumped up 40" or so it also has to overcome 5gal or so of fuel weight above the return fitting. External to the rotary lists, some of those who I have floated the idea with have said the engine will run rich as the fuel rail pressure will increase. However, it doesn't seem to make sense to me as the pressure in the fuel rail will probably be higher, much higher, than the pressure needed to overcome the push through the return fuel line. What are your thoughts? Thank You. -Scott http://home.att.net/~the_stouts_zenith_801/