Return-Path: Received: from mail.viclink.com ([66.129.220.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2985632 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:08:22 -0500 Received: from mail.viclink.com (p072.AS1.viclink.com [66.129.192.72]) by mail.viclink.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i1AE8Bb38449 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:08:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4028E629.7040408@mail.viclink.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:09:45 -0800 From: Perry Mick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: nonEFI fuel systems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030217) (mail.viclink.com) Dale Rogers wrote: >Hi All, > > I want to thank Jim Mosur for refreshing in my mind what I am trying to accomplish. I >just came a gnat's eyelash from purchasing a complete 1985 >RX7 (not running) for about $400 USD. What put me off was >that the owner said it had a 12a engine. > > It looks like I could still buy it, as it was still in >yesterday's paper. But why? Well, for one, it's an >automatic - a real rarity in Arizona - so it already has the correct flywheel and counterweight. I also get an oil >cooler, something the salvage yards want extra $$$ for. >But, it has a carburator and distributor, each of which >means fewer ponies. > > > > I have a multiple-part question: > >(A) Since my intention is to use Tracy's EC, I'd expect to >have to build a custom intake anyway; but can I use the >distributor as a crank angle sensor, much the way that >Chrysler point distributors could be upgraded to hall-effect >sensors for it's electronic ignition? > >(B) Leon, in an exposition about a year and a half back, >rated the 12A at 125 HP; is that before or after mods such >as removal of mufflers and smog equipment, and/or porting? >All the tables I've seen rate the 12A at only 101 HP. >Moving from 125 to 160 HP (the minimum for a COZY) seems >fairly doable; from 101 does not - at least within my >budget. > >(C) I understand I can use the center and end housings with >13B rotor/housings and end up with a four-port 13B, but >would I also have to come up with a 13B eccentric shaft? If >so, does that mean that my flywheel and counterweight are >now useless? > > > In case y'all haven't already figured it out, I'm >building my COZY on a shoestring. I can ill afford to make >any major mistakes; so I am desparate to sort as much out >before I tie up my meager funds. It would appear that my >best choice for the money is a 86-87 FI engine from from an >automatic RX7. Finding that combination has been ... an >*interesting* excercise, so I'm trying to sort out reasonable >alternatives. > >Thanks, >Dale R. >COZY #1254 > > > > Dale, you should avoid the '85. I have a 12A in my hangar and I believe it is heavier than the 13B. I need to get around to weighing it to be sure. The '83-'85 12A cars had the oil to water heat exchanger, not a real oil cooler. If it does have a real oil cooler it might be a GSL-SE, a fuel-injected 13B. But it sounds like it has a carburetor, which means it would definitely be a 12A. To get a 13B you would need to look for a 1984-85 1st gen GSL-SE model only or any second gen 1986-1991. Perry