Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #57256
From: Thomas Mann <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis intake port layout needed
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:27:28 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Yes, the intake is obviously a bigger deal than the exhaust.

From my perspective I would hold out for the CG Parts intake. It's the best approach I have seen to date.
The flange is such a small part of the intake. I'm not going to even consider fabricating the intake.



On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net> wrote:
On 01/03/2012 07:15 PM, Thomas Mann wrote:
Flanges for the rotary are too cheap to justify doing them yourself.
I mean really? How much will you save trying to fabricate a $30 flange?

I'd agree, if there was an intake flange anywhere on that exhaust flange page. :-)

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster