X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [66.219.56.245] (HELO mail.qnsi.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTP id 5307685 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:25:28 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.219.56.245; envelope-from=bhughes@qnsi.net Return-Receipt-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Consensus on oil level switch in pan? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:24:51 -0600 Message-ID: <74120FDE88CAFE4DBDA8814BCE20A3F3387211@qnsi-mail.qnsi.net> Disposition-Notification-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Consensus on oil level switch in pan? Thread-Index: Acy8DnQ6WGKEj+DaQgOnWdz0hkAXLQAAIU+g References: From: "Bobby J. Hughes" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Doug, Is the Renesis oil pan deep enough for aircraft use? Bobby -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of dlomheim@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 10:19 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Consensus on oil level switch in pan? You guys who are flying... did you keep the low oil level switch or remove it? =20 For those who removed it, what is the best way to plug the hole? Thanks for any info. Doug =20 Sent on the Sprint(r) Now Network from my BlackBerry(r) =20 -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html