X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2)
  with ESMTPS id 5306883 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:11:28 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=thomasmann51@gmail.com
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so1802588iaz.25
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=fAkdgRgSHJ3xPdtroPJQm/N/m1fRYmukj5rLNVy1iV4=;
        b=NDEtxD5/cnoP9h8Fh8ORSmidZrl+8vddI4Vf+xlduOISqSSBMyXIGAUUvx5s+p+f7+
         QnAAIV1Aps8yMVMyuN/FvtMZU4awtGHMWumLjQCuQmrSVYrgoM+wGy5TV9P2q8kdpid0
         5VpwbF6XlbFIYenJvgN7dczBVmMURcZDiaBoE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.173.4 with SMTP id bg4mr4998403igc.42.1323997854152; Thu,
 15 Dec 2011 17:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.141.130 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:10:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-5306869@logan.com>
References: <list-5306869@logan.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:10:54 -0600
Message-ID: <CAH_WSmpGFATMwvqsWotXiaF2+2ZEv-mLo3vWarwyCY+Tfk_TCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Low idle
From: Thomas Mann <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f642ec4c7b76604b42b4501

--e89a8f642ec4c7b76604b42b4501
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Ladder speeds in the pattern put me over the numbers at 80 with a stall
speed of 68.

The point that John makes is that the canards are very slick and there are
additional concerns that are somewhat unique.

There was a canard a couple years ago that blew an oil line at 5000 AGL and
made it to a normal landing on a runway 16 miles away.

Yeah, they all seem to have specific traits and trade-offs, for sure.




On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>wrote:

> **
> Now, ask Thomas about his landing speeds....(airliners have about a 20-1
> glide ratio, too).
> :-)
>
> Charlie
>
>
>

--e89a8f642ec4c7b76604b42b4501
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Ladder speeds in the pattern put me over the numbers at 80 with a stall speed of 68.<div><br></div><div>The point that John makes is that the canards are very slick and there are additional concerns that are somewhat unique.</div>
<div><br></div><div>There was a canard a couple years ago that blew an oil line at 5000 AGL and made it to a normal landing on a runway 16 miles away.</div><div><br></div><div>Yeah, they all seem to have specific traits and trade-offs, for sure.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Charlie England <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ceengland@bellsouth.net">ceengland@bellsouth.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>

  
    
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Now, ask Thomas about his landing speeds....(airliners have about a
    20-1 glide ratio, too).<br>
    :-)<br><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    Charlie</font><div class="im"><br>
    <br></div></div></blockquote></div></div>

--e89a8f642ec4c7b76604b42b4501--