X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2)
  with ESMTPS id 5302251 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:18:41 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=thomasmann51@gmail.com
Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so131879iao.25
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:18:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=6d9SLSFPnLpJZkW+81DvMekyQPuwCUjGFN3CoANjiwc=;
        b=fOt7jTgQtDT5wz6PDd7sWMr4ULOtjdIpZzybLSUen0h0hAYZciH9vTpU3eKj70Og9Y
         vmcV6t1SGT4H2Dhh+KA9Ya8eQ+wyyZ+PJIetYV9CSjURMy7/u8RdpHB8un8dK6RgoUuz
         MT/won3POzan1h40F7rk6ChNaf0vwFtoqwQik=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.29.6 with SMTP id p6mr13787974icc.44.1323746283742; Mon, 12
 Dec 2011 19:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.218.2 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:18:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-5302045@logan.com>
References: <list-5302045@logan.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:18:03 -0600
Message-ID: <CAH_WSmpeG-1PBTTT61WSeroR_1dKQdutKm0_TWEtciea7rPfxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Al Gietzen (was: Re: Test)
From: Thomas Mann <thomasmann51@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301d426603e4e504b3f0b325

--20cf301d426603e4e504b3f0b325
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

You crack me up man.
It's not about one example (of someone who could not post due to the
blacklisting of Cox.) There are many. Too boot, bringing to ANYONE'S
attention gets you nowhere.

I'm open to other explanations of the reduced traffic on the list since
last spring. The economy was already sour so that's not it.

I've got it! Bear with me here for a second!

Will everyone who has Cox as their Internet Service Provider please email
the list now!

...............anyone ..........

:-)

Wait a minute ........ based on your post on 7/16, you already know this.
Never mind.
__________________________________________________________________________________

7/16/2011
Dave,

Please accept my apologies for using you as an intermediary for this, but
I'm apparently now in the same situation as Al Geitzen. Could you please
share this with the group? I hope Marv reads this.

I did some follow up on the reject message I got, and it's not COX that is
blocking the mail - it is LOGAN.COM <http://logan.com/>, the host of the
lancaironline list. They are using some blackmai... er, blacklisting
service out of Germany which claims Al and I "live in a bad neighborhood"
(cox dot net). They claim that the 68.n.n.n subnet is allowing "abusers" to
proliferate.

I tried to re-subscribe from another mail service (gmail), but I get
rejected mail there, too -- albeit for a different reason: the server
doesn't seem to recognize the "postmaster" address any more. I tried the
one from the lists page "postmaster@lancaironline.net" and extrapolated "
postmaster@lancair.net" from the Marvin's root page. Both get rejected as
"unknown user account (state 14)".
Does anyone know of an alternative way of re-subscribing?

Or perhaps Marvin could reset some parameters so that Al and I can actually
~participate~ in the list again, instead of being read-only? Or maybe the
list is running on auto-pilot and he has no idea what engaging "uceprotect"
is doing to the list?


Dale_R
COZY rotary MkIV #497
Ch. 13, 16, 22 & 23 in progress

--20cf301d426603e4e504b3f0b325
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You crack me up man.<div>It&#39;s not about one example (of someone who cou=
ld not post due to the blacklisting of Cox.) There are many. Too boot, brin=
ging to ANYONE&#39;S attention gets you nowhere.=A0</div><div><br></div><di=
v>
I&#39;m open to other explanations of the reduced traffic on the list since=
 last spring. The economy was already sour so that&#39;s not it.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>I&#39;ve got it! Bear with me here for a second!</div><div>
<br></div><div>Will everyone who has Cox as their Internet Service Provider=
 please email the list now!</div><div><br></div><div>...............anyone =
..........</div><div><br></div><div>:-)</div><div><br></div><div>Wait a min=
ute ........ based on your post on 7/16, you already know this.</div>
<div>Never mind.</div><div>________________________________________________=
__________________________________</div><div><br></div><div>7/16/2011</div>=
<div>Dave,<br><br>  Please accept my apologies for using you as an intermed=
iary for=20
this, but I&#39;m apparently now in the same situation as Al Geitzen.  Coul=
d you=20
please share this with the group?  I hope Marv reads this.<br><br>  I did s=
ome=20
follow up on the reject message I got, and it&#39;s not COX that is blockin=
g the=20
mail - it is <a href=3D"http://logan.com/" target=3D"_blank">LOGAN.COM</a>,=
 the host=20
of the lancaironline list.  They are using some blackmai... er, blacklistin=
g=20
service out of Germany which claims Al and I &quot;live in a bad neighborho=
od&quot; (cox=20
dot net).  They claim that the 68.n.n.n subnet is allowing &quot;abusers&qu=
ot; to=20
proliferate.<br><br>  I tried to re-subscribe from another mail service (gm=
ail),=20
but I get rejected mail there, too -- albeit for a different reason: the se=
rver=20
doesn&#39;t seem to recognize the &quot;postmaster&quot; address any more. =
 I tried the one=20
from the lists page &quot;<a href=3D"mailto:postmaster@lancaironline.net">p=
ostmaster@lancaironline.net</a>&quot; and=20
extrapolated &quot;<a href=3D"mailto:postmaster@lancair.net">postmaster@lan=
cair.net</a>&quot; from the=20
Marvin&#39;s root page.  Both get rejected as &quot;unknown user account (s=
tate=20
14)&quot;.<br>Does anyone know of an alternative way of re-subscribing?<br>=
<br>  Or=20
perhaps Marvin could reset some parameters so that Al and I can actually=20
~participate~ in the list again, instead of being read-only?  Or maybe the =
list=20
is running on auto-pilot and he has no idea what engaging &quot;uceprotect&=
quot; is doing=20
to the list?<br><br><br>Dale_R<br>COZY rotary MkIV #497<br>Ch. 13, 16, 22 &=
amp;=20
23  in progress</div><div><br></div><div><br><br></div>

--20cf301d426603e4e504b3f0b325--