X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPS id 5203197 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:37:49 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=thomasmann51@gmail.com Received: by iagz35 with SMTP id z35so1897585iag.25 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:37:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4Id0B2RuPldSouh7a/mevW5BiGmHGWvUZ/Nd3X9O97Y=; b=Ht5fF9mWJxODQV344GD9XD0Fsh8RzS1Q3+ira2Pvu5QKLW6B5QVg8odBVVpGsyB55g ml3xhQejH34npmAsqJBKN+qlKJgzxQziZBcpM1Rn+G3kR7rgygRXt5faquzyLgUlPnRN TFYO1uo1B7weBYo4RNvJaIZtjEiE290UQLnhM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.139.2 with SMTP id e2mr38049183icu.22.1321504632630; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.223.10 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:37:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:37:11 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Is it just me...... From: Thomas Mann To: Fly Rotary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6136f6326cf604b1e6c6e4 --90e6ba6136f6326cf604b1e6c6e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Yep, the website is an area of issue as well, needing much, much attention. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I just think you've lost the passion or energy to produce Contact. I see where you are active withe EAA Experimenter so maybe it's just a matter of being more motivated to work on the new thing. As someone stated about 'having too many irons in the fire" you took on the commitment of the new gig (Experimenter) and pretty much left Contact subscribers hanging. I only bring this up as a warning to those who are considering subscribing to Contact so they realize the reality of the subscription. I bought a new subscription in October of 2010. I got a back issue (#101) and issue #102 ......... that's it. There are some terms that come to mind that would accurately (and legally) describe the way this is playing out. I do admit, I am also partially to blame. I should have noticed that you haven't met a bi-monthly schedule in years. It looks like 2007 was the last year it followed a bi-monthly schedule. When did you take over the publication? T Mann --90e6ba6136f6326cf604b1e6c6e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >Yep, the website is an area of issue as well, needing much, much attent= ion.
------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------------------------
I just think you&#= 39;ve lost the passion or energy to produce Contact.
I see where you are active withe EAA Experimenter so maybe it's ju= st a matter of being more motivated to work on the new thing.
As someone stated about 'having too many irons in the fire&= quot; you took on the commitment of the new gig (Experimenter) and pretty m= uch left Contact subscribers hanging.

I only bring this up as a warning to those who are cons= idering subscribing to Contact so they realize the reality of the subscript= ion.

I bought a new subscription in October of 201= 0. I got a back issue (#101) and issue #102 ......... that's it.

There are some terms that come to mind that would accur= ately (and legally) describe the way this is playing out.

I do admit, I am also partially to blame. I should have noticed tha= t you haven't met a bi-monthly schedule in years. It looks like 2007 wa= s the last year it followed a bi-monthly schedule.

When did you take over the publication?

<= /div>
T Mann
--90e6ba6136f6326cf604b1e6c6e4--