X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.161.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPS id 5201505 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:32:48 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.161.180; envelope-from=editor.contactmagazine@gmail.com Received: by ggnv5 with SMTP id v5so18344814ggn.25 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:32:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EORHvZri9k28af8Q5evw3dvvHuf50MxDn98/kzhh08U=; b=PeCpENh8cZkWFBMSJ2tNepLhfUIp2mz3FZ0yFm3AFARC9/j7pyR3GD6U/24+Bsdinn R0R6N/WYNhWBNnzh8gP7Z3rjKovtDi03bfdXNuPm1PY5B+QoRU2ZzXEqRoq4BRTzjK4c qp1FdLAs8gDck8o8g44R+/04gWYAHxmnzbs2o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.127.27 with SMTP id e27mr2171207yan.34.1321399931287; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.203.8 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:32:11 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: panzera@experimental-aviation.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:32:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Is it just me...... From: Patrick Panzera To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4cfc482b9d304b1ce65e4 --000e0cd4cfc482b9d304b1ce65e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No, not belly-up by any means. My architecture business supported the nonprofit mission of CONTACT! Magazine for nearly a decade, and with the housing industry currently in the toilet, I've had to let all my drafting employees go and run the business alone. I was semi-retired since about mid-2000. About 4 years ago, EAA asked me to edit the Experimenter eNewsletter and I had no problem doing both, but it's demanding a lot of my time. We've had the next issue nearly ready since early spring, I just can't get enough time to finish it up... but that's about to change. Hopefully we'll be back up and running in a matter of weeks. Pat On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jarrett Johnson wrote: > Come to think of it, I have't seen one in a while either.. > > I think my subscription is still 'good'. > > Jarrett Johnson > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:10:39 -0600, Thomas Mann **wrote: > > Has anyone received an issue of Contact Magazine this year? > I seem to remember getting an issue about this time last year but I > haven't seen one since. > > I guess they've gone belly-up, yes? > > > > > www.innovention-tech.com > > --000e0cd4cfc482b9d304b1ce65e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, not belly-up by any means.

My architecture business = supported the nonprofit mission of CONTACT! Magazine for nearly a decade, a= nd with the housing industry currently in the toilet, I've had to let a= ll my drafting employees go and run the business alone. I was semi-retired = since about mid-2000. About 4 years ago, EAA asked me to edit the Experimen= ter eNewsletter and I had no problem doing both, but it's demanding a l= ot of my time.=A0

We've had the next issue nearly ready since early s= pring, I just can't get enough time to finish it up... but that's a= bout to change. Hopefully we'll be back up and running in a matter of w= eeks.=A0

Pat

On Tue, Nov 15, 2= 011 at 3:20 PM, Jarrett Johnson <hjjohnson@sasktel.net> wrote:
Come to think of it, I have't seen one in a while either..

I thi= nk my subscription is still 'good'.

Jarrett Johnson

On Tue,= 15 Nov 2011 17:10:39 -0600, Thomas Mann wrote:
Has anyone received an issue of Contact Magazine this year?=A0
I seem to remember getting an issue about this time last year but I ha= ven't seen one since.

I guess they've gone belly-up, yes?


www.in= novention-tech.com



--000e0cd4cfc482b9d304b1ce65e4--