Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net
Message-ID: <4E3C73B7.8030408@att.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:50:31 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
Reply-To: echristley@att.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Ideas for direct injection
References: <list-5083267@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-5083267@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kelly Troyer wrote:
> Ernest,
>    Should you need a 6 port lower manifold let me know..........Will 
> ship you
> one posthaste !!..................
> 

Hold onto it for now, Kelly.  My goal right now is to get a reliable system with the least amount of work, even if it is 
not the optimum one.  My project is wanting to be an airplane really bad.

I don't think my intake is the best it could be, but the EGTs are close to being equal, and I will see soon if I'm 
making sufficient power for flight.  (now that I've about finished the priming and sanding.)  If I cure the pooling of 
fuel in the bottom of the intake, I'll call it good enough.  I think the easiest path to that point may be to turn the 
secondary injectors around to spray into the outer intake runners.  Once I'm flying, I can turn my attention to 
optimizing an intake, and at that point the flange off a 6-port lower manifold will be useful; but, at that point I'll 
be able to fly out and pick it up from you personally 8*)