Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #55149
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower experiment: FAIL
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:30:18 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
On 05/20/2011 07:27 PM, Ed Anderson wrote:
Mike, general centrifugal impeller such as used in turbocharger and some superchargers are rev up to much higher rpm than the engine operates at. Ernest concept involved using the engine rpm (direct drive so to speak) which is much lower than the rpm these centrifugal impellers require (for any useful pressure increase).  So slower rpm generally means larger impellers than commonly found in turbo or superchargers.  If not constrained to the engine rpm then yes, your suggestion would have merit - on the other hand,  there may be impeller off superchargers of those big multirow radial engines of WWII that would be large enough - probably hard to find and heavy.
Not so hard to find:
http://cgi.ebay.com/PRATT-WHITNEY-RADIAL-ENGINE-IMPELLER-/320701148172?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4aab472c0c

http://cgi.ebay.com/PRATT-WHITNEY-RADIAL-ENGINE-IMPELLER-/320701149501?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4aab47313d

and I also found this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/TROY-BILT-TB4BP-BACKPACK-BLOWER-IMPELLER-FAN-753-05657-/270718363966?_trksid=p3286.m7&_trkparms=algo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D3%26po%3DLVI%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D71785288103015489

The problem is with cutting the most of the center out.  Then it is just cantilevered blades stick up.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster