X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm21.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.222] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with SMTP id 4990040 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:24:05 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.237.222; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [66.94.237.196] by nm21.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2011 00:23:28 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.108] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2011 00:23:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 May 2011 00:23:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 778548.55165.bm@omp1013.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 83119 invoked from network); 21 May 2011 00:23:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1305937408; bh=BLDcJGEvUd6+25b753ALPKGzYV2gD2l0Pb1W2hp75qA=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=I+XfE3yhMgm2YEmtrLqznvJDTvC3xxhjiP9jlXo9SlqAoBGZIx0+NeM2HaM+i10I4fe2duf+XlEHnfMpfWRQokFNT8I4sQ6sMIgUQGaUtdWkGRDcgi6/M/yKmOzgWav7zwgDaBSJXNvYif8HucDuvk8yjBwbfNOVOgbCdvJJ/fU= Received: from [192.168.1.2] (echristley@65.190.53.180 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 May 2011 17:23:28 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: 40RP3pGswBDvPav1a.I8eMv.KS8bdgWBnCloVoKaow-- X-YMail-OSG: 1LxOBiMVM1lf4JkySzzFUP2D9EFHdTTvMzBoQb0m_19nqlu Lx06PoH1rJJz_QshwzzN7Iy79I0dTQWM65zGmj9dakOf0t2V5YdrO.N_wvRT 0RQzVdo9HkYHOGxBRcOsIIatK274oc6d4RRCoZ4_spf3W5QCpGtJTLFlPRMs 6iKnw6taeAJSCFTpd_l9LwDrxhYgwukJuBipHlm_CEWTmHxxVSw0fXV2.ynW Q90b0edkd9tmVtYMrYoc4dA6qdUNMS14oiGXz.sLSfRx5NbRA599dQ9jZ9p6 0BnAEpRNEvDp.auWRapeURoybZiaobyBCKFQXYWbSWFbD4Uwv7V4- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DD705FA.1030403@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:23:22 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower experiment: FAIL References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/20/2011 06:27 PM, Michael McMahon wrote: > I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but would this be considered a > supercharger, since it's being driven by the engine all of the time? Are > there supercharger or turbocharger impellers that would be large enough? > And finally, would a laser-glue thingamabob (I CANNOT think of the name for > the laserjet like parts 'printers') be able to make a part to withstand the > stress? If not on its own, could it be used to make a mold or to be coated > with something stronger? The printed plastics are fairly weak stuff. Think a hot glue gun. They make some resins that make molds that are lost wax castable, but none of them are going to withstand 6000 RPM.