|
I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but would this be considered a
supercharger, since it's being driven by the engine all of the time? Are
there supercharger or turbocharger impellers that would be large enough?
And finally, would a laser-glue thingamabob (I CANNOT think of the name for
the laserjet like parts 'printers') be able to make a part to withstand the
stress? If not on its own, could it be used to make a mold or to be coated
with something stronger?
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Ernest Christley
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 2:25 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower experiment: FAIL
I doubt any amount of balancing would have kept the blower together.
The highest RPM I hit was aroun 4000. Most of the rivets were sheared
cleanly. My design was simply not anywhere close to robust enough.
I've got a line on a company that will do one-off dynamic balancing in North
Carolina. Do you think I could convince you to mill me a rotor, and then I
could get my whole assembly balanced?
H & J Johnson wrote:
> Ernest, did you get a high speed dynamic balance on your blower? I've
> built blowers of a similar form and had good results, but only after
> balancing to rated RPM.
>
> Jarrett Johnson
> www.innovention-tech.com
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> Some of you may recall my blower experiment. Using the shaft between
> the flywheel and PSRU to drive a centrifugal fan to charge the intake.
>
> My implementation died in the crib. before.jpg shows what it looked
> like a week ago. after.jpg is what was left of it after the few
> minutes I was able to get the engine to run. Well, that wasn't all
> that was left over. intake.jpg shows how the blades got thrown toward
> the intake and smashed up against the air filter.
>
> Oh, well. Until I can design and build or have built an impeller that
> can handle 8000RPM, I'm going to table this experiment. I still think
> it is a good idea. So did these guys:
>
> http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%200142.html
>
> Furthermore, the calculator at
> http://www.forestryforum.com/members/donp/Blowercalc.htm indicates
> that with the 10.4" diameter, 3.35" deep area available for me to put
> a blower, I should be able to generate 17" water column pressure.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|