X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTPS id 4989991 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:27:50 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=afm528@gmail.com Received: by pxi6 with SMTP id 6so2551261pxi.31 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:27:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=SnkZN6f8hSXz7JaCN7hDPOBAhckxr7ha8cav0UoDoT4=; b=EoE0g+jby1B8rV5lXWniAz88twoxBKQ1t3k7R4CG1u5DJuhc+u34FSA6WsmYa1nxMs 0oy5SiUPNRI9GQ1ssGRfe2bZuTZHcw/XvMTTN4PbB2ViUXyMZgu7mBXSqCmarm/NsJdr 33Noc7QH8FydevJLfmo3wcRwX8aJD/8kYVQcw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=ZkQ4XNzBTfpZ+tl17Ua7bwaaW6kOSOgG8zKFybR5vyYCHKF6Y69GQuUBaNZg9SD1xq nN39FZEuz/IIYsI373c8HXIORBk15TToDTyoJqF0TfFy0GSm6oFXp1Sl3N5XAhWEluYG yIpqLY7HJNckdCrfzCoFF25bL2hJJKzjzqegE= Received: by 10.68.68.200 with SMTP id y8mr60620pbt.92.1305930432617; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from MichaelHP (c-24-5-163-54.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.163.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v9sm2702596pbk.17.2011.05.20.15.27.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 May 2011 15:27:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael McMahon" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower experiment: FAIL Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:27:59 -0700 Message-ID: <157d01cc173d$2db96370$892c2a50$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AQE1yDMkc0LesnRfM/NVYdkzvn64WpXC6NEw Content-Language: en-us I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but would this be considered a supercharger, since it's being driven by the engine all of the time? Are there supercharger or turbocharger impellers that would be large enough? And finally, would a laser-glue thingamabob (I CANNOT think of the name for the laserjet like parts 'printers') be able to make a part to withstand the stress? If not on its own, could it be used to make a mold or to be coated with something stronger? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ernest Christley Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 2:25 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower experiment: FAIL I doubt any amount of balancing would have kept the blower together. The highest RPM I hit was aroun 4000. Most of the rivets were sheared cleanly. My design was simply not anywhere close to robust enough. I've got a line on a company that will do one-off dynamic balancing in North Carolina. Do you think I could convince you to mill me a rotor, and then I could get my whole assembly balanced? H & J Johnson wrote: > Ernest, did you get a high speed dynamic balance on your blower? I've > built blowers of a similar form and had good results, but only after > balancing to rated RPM. > > Jarrett Johnson > www.innovention-tech.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > Some of you may recall my blower experiment. Using the shaft between > the flywheel and PSRU to drive a centrifugal fan to charge the intake. > > My implementation died in the crib. before.jpg shows what it looked > like a week ago. after.jpg is what was left of it after the few > minutes I was able to get the engine to run. Well, that wasn't all > that was left over. intake.jpg shows how the blades got thrown toward > the intake and smashed up against the air filter. > > Oh, well. Until I can design and build or have built an impeller that > can handle 8000RPM, I'm going to table this experiment. I still think > it is a good idea. So did these guys: > > http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%200142.html > > Furthermore, the calculator at > http://www.forestryforum.com/members/donp/Blowercalc.htm indicates > that with the 10.4" diameter, 3.35" deep area available for me to put > a blower, I should be able to generate 17" water column pressure. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html