Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #54982
From: Mark Steitle <msteitle@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: 100LL in California
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:58 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 Message Header

Undecoded Message
Ernest,
 
Good question (I was wondering that myself).  I guess we'll have to wait and see if the oil companies just roll over, or if they'll stand up and fight.
 
Mark

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote:
Mark Steitle wrote:
Bill,
 You could be right on that.  It surely won't hurt to put a little pressure on the FAA to find/approve an alternative aviation fuel.  Personally, I would be happy if they would make premium auto fuel ethanol free.  On another note, with the time it takes for things to work their way through the court system, it will be years before this gets resolved.  The oil companies can afford to hire the best attorneys.
 
Sure, but would they?  Will they pay for the attorneys knowing that 100LL is such low volume and is going to have to go away eventually anyhow?

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster