Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #5476
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: [VAF Mailing List] Engine Choice
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:40:38 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Fuess
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:23 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] FW: [VAF Mailing List] Engine Choice

Guys,

 

Forgive me for beating a dead horse about torsionals.  I have been reading another list for (VAF and RV-7) ~2 years, and have anxiously anticipated installing a 13B, and now instead a Renesis engine, in my soon-to-start RV-7.  Now, I am hearing things that cause me to question my ability to make a sound decision in this regard, as this is the first discussion of torsionals is the first I have heard.  I am beginning to question my ability to follow through on what I had taken to be the best alternative engine choice.

 

I am therefore forwarding the most seemingly competent post (I am not enough of an engineer to evaluate this) regarding this issue.  My first impressions were that rotaries were much less susceptible to torisionals that regular engines, but recently that view has come into apparently serious question, based on the statements below.

 

Appreciate your thoughts and comments.

 

Regards,

 

Greg Fuess

 

 

Greg, I believe the best evidence that Bill's viewpoint is somewhat misleading is that there are very few powersport PSRUs flying - while between the old Ross RSRU and Tracy's series of Redrives there has to be at least 30 airfames flying.  Tracy has over 1400 hours, many others are in the hundreds of hours and one gyrocopter (Using a Ross Planetary PSRU reported had accumulated over 2500 hours) with not a single reported case (to my knowledge) of PSRU failure caused by torsional problems.  My point is that if there were a problem with torsionals and the planetary gear box approach to PSRUs for the rotary it would have surfaced long before now.

 

I think someone pointed out that there is a difference in the load profile between a dyno and a propeller - perhaps that could be the reason these "Failures" only seem to happen on Dynos. 

 

However, having said that - YOU are the one that has to make the decision.  You are doing the right thing in getting different viewpoints - but, viewpoints and opinions are cheap.  Evidence of what is working in aircraft, I believe is what you should look for.  The PowerSport PSRU will apparently work, even if a big heavy and pricey, and we know that Tracy's redives work with numerous flying examples.  But, you need to consider your comfort level with each.  

 

Good luck

 

Ed Anderson

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster