X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm15.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2) with SMTP id 4905062 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:16:04 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.44.142; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from [98.139.44.104] by nm15.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2011 19:15:29 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.81] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2011 19:15:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2011 19:15:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 848182.9944.bm@omp1018.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 74921 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Mar 2011 19:15:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1300043729; bh=M2y8m4Cm6r8s2OM/VF7SHSmXbLzJrzKqjk+CSZzipck=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hAStTNh8E/3S1dH5/q9GaxyPl4Ygb9n0jdYHTooXllqkJTCzqnMADCkK3Uuqa4HLAGk9BZ7EpYQ502ClhWpGTb9y0a9U/F9cYCRY5vbLvNPk3/TS0XADcYrYXKJOHahSRapPvTF9PHEy1N/xxLhQfEmZgjXFx1ZXXYiyaugyYw0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hZ+w2dq+rABQAlBor58aU5rDOZ+XhitzlTtvACJfhGdOj43IV6t7o//mIQ80H30ecZdYl/Cbl8LSb6H6TGg6ZmwzmD6akVhd/iJHhlPBUfQU0WrvvQ8bZzjdegqXlmnXAwxPLGK+fYpdUy7XGxDM+7Z/2j0R/OAkPnk3zkoQUW0=; Message-ID: <602118.74215.qm@web83904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: J96uTMEVM1mAQKJYEzoCiIgID8lXreMl1m2KnLIWorJcWPa al.sg4GZXNx.sOFfA7C2tbn3yYeCbR70YaS16.2uL7RIV1nB8olmAQ_jYYoE I.vpXrCBryhzkGr64uwJl.pzsI6vrHsWpW07KRzbX4D9rdKn4i9m8_0SoG7I twA1huEbJT3XTv_55ToRdZz3dgeTlS_7OOlXo.3we2JaDMDCFsE6mZQI4ksJ PDnaOHAMwwFdyn1nohUcSEDp0kKq1Td0auiU_2BnNPZ3GiFGbHtye0RW6bwL LHu20VF_KZ67.PK9NN1xHop8slQ-- Received: from [208.114.43.94] by web83904.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:15:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.292656 References: Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Troyer Subject: Marcotte PSRU vs 550HP Turbo/20B To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-155690012-1300043729=:74215" --0-155690012-1300043729=:74215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thomas,=0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0What HP rating=A0is Marcotte claiming for h= is PSRU ?...............From =0Athe experience=A0of a few users =0A=0Aon=A0= this group and others using=A0product have reported=A0it seems to have a = =0Acheckered operational and=0Amaintenance history..............John of thi= s group (13B/Marcotte in Tailwind) =0Areported a problem he had=0Ato resolv= e not long ago..............John jump in here and give Thomas your =0Aexper= ience and if you think=0Athis PSRU will stand up to a Turbo/20B of about 55= 0+ HP..................I =0Apersonally would have severe=0Areservations abo= ut the Marcotte at that power level..............FWIW=0A=A0=0A=A0=0AKelly T= royer=0A"DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)=0A"13B ROTARY"_ Engine=0A"RWS"_RD1C/E= C2/EM2=0A"MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=0A"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo=0A= =0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Thomas Giddings =0ATo: Rotary motors in aircraft =0ASent: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:37:10 PM=0ASubject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cr= ankcase ventilation=0A=0ADoes anyone have any experience using a 2.40 gear = reduction on the 20B? I am =0Agoing to use the Marcotte PSRU only because h= e has a much higher =A0HP Rating and =0Ait is only offered in the 2.40 rati= o in the configuration I am using. However I =0Anotice everyone uses the 2.= 85 more commonly. Is there a specific reason why this =0Awould be better fo= r the 20B?. I would appreciate any input any of you might have =0Ato offer.= =0A=0A=0AKind Regards=0ATom=A0 --0-155690012-1300043729=:74215 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A
Thomas,
=0A
     =    What HP rating is Marcotte claiming for his PSRU ?.......= ........From the experience of a few users
=0A
on this = group and others using product have reported it seems to have a c= heckered operational and
=0A
maintenance history..............John= of this group (13B/Marcotte in Tailwind) reported a problem he had
= =0A
to resolve not long ago..............John jump in here and give Tho= mas your experience and if you think
=0A
this PSRU will stand up t= o a Turbo/20B of about 550+ HP..................I personally would have sev= ere
=0A
reservations about the Marcotte at that power level.......= .......FWIW
=0A
 
 
=0A

Kelly Troyer
"DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)=

=0A

"13B ROTARY"_ Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"MISTRAL"_= Backplate/Oil Manifold

=0A

"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo

=0A

<= /DIV>=0A

=0A
=0A
=0A= From: Thomas Giddings <tom@= midwestaviation.net>
To:<= /B> Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:37:10= PM
Subject: [FlyRotary]= Re: Crankcase ventilation

Does anyone have any experience us= ing a 2.40 gear reduction on the 20B? I am going to use the Marcotte PSRU o= nly because he has a much higher  HP Rating and it is only offered in = the 2.40 ratio in the configuration I am using. However I notice everyone u= ses the 2.85 more commonly. Is there a specific reason why this would be be= tter for the 20B?. I would appreciate any input any of you might have to of= fer. =0A

=0A
Kind Regards
=0A
Tom 

= =0A
 
--0-155690012-1300043729=:74215--