X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with ESMTP id 4888368 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:50:11 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.146; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (imo-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.138]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p22MnUYG015238 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.fde.c940632 (43892) for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:49:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic-m21.mail.aol.com (magic-m21.mail.aol.com [172.20.22.194]) by cia-dc05.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC055-ab744d6ec975334; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:49:25 -0500 From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:49:25 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] BF-109G vice Re: [FlyRotary] BF-190G To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ce3c4.6fe5981c.3aa02375_boundary" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5382 X-AOL-IP: 72.187.199.116 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Lehanover@aol.com --part1_ce3c4.6fe5981c.3aa02375_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/2/2011 1:23:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: Perhaps I can get it all straight with this e mail - all my references to BF-190G should be BF-109G - (two completely different aircraft) the information and links are correct - just my dyslectic brain is frazzled. You were thinking FW-190.............. Lynn E. Hanover --part1_ce3c4.6fe5981c.3aa02375_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 3/2/2011 1:23:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20 eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
Perhaps I can get it all straight with this e mail&n= bsp; -=20 all my references to BF-190G should be BF-109G - (two completely differe= nt=20 aircraft)  the information and links are correct -  just my=20 dyslectic brain is frazzled.
You were thinking FW-190..............
 
Lynn E. Hanover
--part1_ce3c4.6fe5981c.3aa02375_boundary--