Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #5396
From: sqpilot@earthlink <sqpilot@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake question
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:59:51 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:36 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake question

Actually, Rusty, the secondary ports on the NA block and the turbo block are different.  In fact, when I saw the amount of gasket it reminded me of the amount I see when I try a NA manifold against a turbo block.  Secondaries on the NA and Turbo are different. 
 
 Ed Anderson 
 
I called up Atkins, and they said they never made a straight manifold for the turbo block, though they did make one for an "early 4 port".  I think they're referring to something like the 84-85 13B in the RX-7, but I'm not sure.  They also made a straight manifold for the 6 port, which must be what I have.  Silly me, I actually expected the 6 port manifold to have 6 ports, like the engine does.  
 
Next time I go to the hanger, you can bet that I'll be measuring some manifolds.  I'm now wondering if the one I was using previously had the proper size ports.  Ignorance is bliss :-)
 
I'm still not sure what I'll do.  The manifold would certainly run like this, but it would never be right.  At the moment, I'd like to get done with this &*#$@ fiberglass oil cooler scoop.  At least it's far better looking than BUC.
 
Cheers,
Rusty (who as you know, hates fiberglass) 
 
Hi, Rusty....after our phone conversation regarding the intake manifolds, I just had to have a look. I just now removed my latest manifold, and you are correct. The secondary intake holes measure 1 3/4 incheson my latest manifold.  On Dave Atkins' wrap-around manifold, they measure 2 1/2 inches.  On the engine, the ports measure only 1 3/4 inches. 
       When I bought the 3 thousand dollar EFI and fuel system from him, he said that it would fit a 1989 turbo engine fine, since it is a 4-port. I just assumed that "fit fine" meant fit fine.  Glad I ended up with the latest manifold. Everything appears to be the right size.  Sorry if I mislead you....Unfortunately, I was going from Dave Atkin's statements, and worse of all, from memory.  I'm learning that I should never do that. (working from memory).  I had a nice memory course on cassette, but I forgot where I put it.  Thanks for pointing out the differences in the ports. Paul Conner


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster