Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2938989 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:13:37 -0500 Received: from edward (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i0JIDYKZ020786 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:13:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <002a01c3deb7$f6a425c0$2402a8c0@edward> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake question Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:13:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C3DE8E.0D868D70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C3DE8E.0D868D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:21 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake question That is clearly the intake I sent you. I had not Idea that it didn't = fit. I guess I just never looked that closely. On the other hand, I = can't believe I would have missed a miss-match that big. I also can't = believe someone would manufacture an intake specifically for an engine = but not bother to get the ports the right size. Are you very sure that = you have everything right side up and orientation? I'll take the intake back if you don't like it, but I wouldn't use JB = weld. Regards, David Leonard Hi David, I'm sure these ports aren't the same on all engines, and it's hard to = say what the intake was actually made to fit. Thanks for the offer to = take it back, but that won't be necessary. Cheers, Rusty Actually, Rusty, the secondary ports on the NA block and the turbo = block are different. In fact, when I saw the amount of gasket it = reminded me of the amount I see when I try a NA manifold against a turbo = block. Secondaries on the NA and Turbo are different. Ed Anderson ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C3DE8E.0D868D70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
 ----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 = 10:21=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake = question

That is clearly the intake I sent you.  I had = not Idea=20 that it didn't fit.  I guess I just never looked that = closely.  On=20 the other hand, I can't believe I would have missed a miss-match that=20 big.  I also can't believe someone would manufacture an intake=20 specifically for an engine but not bother to get the ports the right=20 size.  Are you very sure that you have everything right side up = and=20 orientation?

I'll take the intake back if you don't like it, = but I=20 wouldn't use JB weld.

Regards,
David Leonard

 
Hi=20 David,
 
I'm = sure these ports=20 aren't the same on all engines, and it's hard to say what the intake = was=20 actually made to fit.  Thanks for the offer to take it back, = but=20 that won't be necessary.
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 

Actually, Rusty, the secondary ports on the NA = block and=20 the turbo block are different.  In fact, when I saw the amount of = gasket=20 it reminded me of the amount I see when I try a NA manifold against a = turbo=20 block.  Secondaries on the NA and Turbo are = different.

Ed Anderson


------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C3DE8E.0D868D70--