Return-Path: <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2937349 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:26:26 -0500
Received: from edward (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20])
	by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i0IEQNKZ020248
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:26:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <002b01c3ddcf$0efa9da0$2402a8c0@edward>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2936839@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Article - SportAviation Mag
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:26:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine


Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Article - SportAviation Mag


> It would seem that one could put a divider on the rad to split it into
> "smaller" rads and shorten the duct.
>
 Now that's an interesting approach.  Would certainly seem to have merit - I
mean the radiator duct wouldn't know it was one larger radiator {:>).  I
can't think of any reason off-hand why that would not work.

Ed Anderson