X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTP id 4642911 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:36:41 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.147; envelope-from=Bktrub@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oBFMa06W006939 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:36:00 -0500 Received: from Bktrub@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.cc3.59573d87 (37258) for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:35:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.169]) by cia-ma07.mx.aol.com (v129.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA078-b2364d0942ca385; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:35:55 -0500 Received: from webmail-m078 (webmail-m078.sim.aol.com [64.12.141.36]) by smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE023-b2364d0942ca385; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:35:54 -0500 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Rotary Engine Considerations Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:35:54 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 69.84.254.253 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bktrub@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD6ABF91BC3380_13D4_BEC3_webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32992-STANDARD Received: from 69.84.254.253 by webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com (64.12.141.36) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:35:54 -0500 Message-Id: <8CD6ABF91B50F5D-13D4-4B34@webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Bktrub@aol.com ----------MB_8CD6ABF91BC3380_13D4_BEC3_webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" You are corresponding with a group of people who are biased toward the rot= ary engine. We believe that it is much superior to conventional piston en= gine engines. It is more compact, smoother, more durable, and much less ex= pensive. But, it's definately not plug and play. There aren't any bolt-on= engine packages at this point. We all think that all the work that we put= in to utilize these engines is worth the advantages of these engines. So,= with that in mind, know that you will have to do or find someone to help= you make an engine mount, exhaust system, etc. Just know what you are in= for. I just completed an engine installation, I had never built a plane= before, or done serious welding, or any real machining, but have acquired= enough of these skills to succeed in getting this plane into the air. To= me, it was worth it, I have 190 or so horsepower for a total of less than= $8000 firewall forward. Just know that you will have to do some problem= solving. This newsletter is invaluable for that, and I credit it with for= my success. You can do this, just know that you will do more work than ju= st writing a check to someone, but we are here to help you if you decide= to go for it.=20 Brian Trubee -----Original Message----- From: George Rippeto To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 12:46 pm Subject: [FlyRotary] Rotary Engine Considerations=20 I am at the point in my project were I would like to order my engine. This= is a canard installation. I would like a turbo charged 13B. What informat= ion do I need to provide to the engine supplier? Is there some kind of che= cklist or something I can use to help me? =20 Thanks, =20 George=20 ----------MB_8CD6ABF91BC3380_13D4_BEC3_webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
You are corresponding with a group of people who are biased towa= rd the rotary engine. We  believe that it is much superior to convent= ional piston engine engines. It is more compact, smoother, more durable,= and much less expensive. But, it's definately not plug and play. The= re aren't any bolt-on engine packages at this point. We all thin= k that all the work that we put in to utilize these engines is worth the= advantages of these engines. So, with that in mind, know that you will ha= ve to do or find someone to help you make an engine mount, exhaust system,= etc. Just know what you are in for. I just completed an engine installati= on, I had never built a plane before, or done serious welding, or any real= machining, but have acquired enough of these skills to succeed in getting= this plane into the air. To me, it was worth it, I have 190 or so horsepo= wer for a total of less than $8000 firewall forward. Just know that you wi= ll have to do some problem solving. This newsletter is invaluable for that= , and I credit it with for my success. You can do this, just know that you= will do more work than just writing a check to someone, but we are here= to help you if you decide to go for it.
 
Brian Trubee



-----Original Message-----
From: George Rippeto <grippeto@yahoo.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 12:46 pm
Subject: [
FlyRotary] Rotary Engine Considerations

I am at the point in my project were I would like to order my engine.= This is a canard installation. I would like a turbo charged 13B. What information do I need to provide to= the engine supplier? Is there some kind of checklist or something I can= use to help me?
 
Thanks,
 
George 

----------MB_8CD6ABF91BC3380_13D4_BEC3_webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com--