X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4182396 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:46:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.104; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-230-67-114.mco.bellsouth.net[74.230.67.114]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20100329154612H0400ccr5fe>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:46:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.230.67.114] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Flight data Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:46:12 -0400 Message-ID: <7A9EEA1B742D473A95774A1ABBB968E9@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcrPASNw2UuKApvuT+a7pCJm+VR/oQAVNGuw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Don, Could we please have a little more info on how you restricted the lines and what you used to make the accumulation chamber? I would like to try something like that to see if it helps my situation. I am also not certain how to try and compare your static rpm results at 5000 ft with what I get at 55 ft or with Dennis' results at 1000 ft. I know the thinner air would make the prop turn easier and the engine to make less power, but I don't know how that would equate in the total picture. In other words, what static rpm would the same plane produce at 55, 1000, and 5000 ft??? Bill B -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Don Wallker Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:31 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Flight data I'm getting 6080 RPM static. I could only get about 5800 or so, then noticed that my Manifold pressure bounced around plus or minus about 1.5 inches. Tracy changed out one of the sensors in the EC-2 that may or may not have been a problem, but the big thing was to dampen out the pressure going back to the EC-2. It is almost rock solid at any Map now. I restricted the lines way down for a couple of inches then it runs into an accumulation chamber about 2 inches long filled with tightly rolled up scubby green pad. I think that the pulses messed with the brain of the EC-2 and it didn't know exactly where it was as pressures to the sensors were many several times a second. My field elevation is 5000 ft with a Catto 76/88 with the C model PSRU and a stock Renesis. Also play with your mixture. Try turning it a little leaner! Hope this helps. Don Walker R113BR flying -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html