Ah, yes, less we forget the marketing hype
– I mean to most folks either acronym is equally meaningless, but sounds
like it should cost $$ {:>) and makes it worth what they pay for the sports
car..
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Bryan Winberry
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010
8:15 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE DEI:
[FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to
turbo
Ed,
Not be outdone, Mazda calls it –
Sequential Dynamic Air Intake System or S-DAIS.
Now there’s a harmless acronym if
I’ve ever seen one. Not anywhere close to death.
Bryan
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010
7:31 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] DIE DEI:
[FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to
turbo
Bryan, if it makes you feel any better, the correct name for the DIE
effect is Dynamic Effect Intake or (DEI) – but the other acronym (DIE) is
easier to remember for some reason {:>)
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Bryan Winberry
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010
5:24 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
Yes George, I was referring to the Renesis
manifold. Specifically though, I was talking about the valve that
produces the D.I.E. effect.
What a terrible acronym.
BW
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010
4:28 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
I'm hearing you, I guess you mean
the Renesis manifold. Maybe someone can duplicate that in carbon fiber, in a
more compact form. I know - another job for Bill Jepson.
George,
It’s a shame that the stock intake
that does all this using a valve, can’t be used in our application.
Bryan
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010
3:54 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
I missed where the 43" came
from, however from my calculations for 44mm inlet tube, my calculations came to
21.36". That's for a straight tube inlet manifold. That's interesting
isn't it.
This is hard for me to visualize as well.
Perhaps if you get a chance, you could snap a picture from the top.
Did you get 43 in. from #1 secondary to #2
secondary?
Bryan
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010
11:29 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
Dennis,
I just looked at your picture again…the
secondary look much longer than the primaries. It may be an optical
illusion??? I bet you mean 1 1/8 id??
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Dennis Haverlah
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010
11:03 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
All my tubes are the same
length and the same diameters. I can check but I think they were 1 1/4
id. and 1 1/4 od.
Bill Bradburry wrote:
Dennis,
Aren’t your primary and secondary tubes
different lengths from rotor face to rotor face? If so, what are
the two lengths? Are they different diameters?
Bill B
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3267 (20080714) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3267 (20080714) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com