George,

It’s a shame that the stock intake that does all this using a valve, can’t be used in our application.

Bryan

 

---

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:54 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo

 

Bryan,

I missed where the 43" came from, however from my calculations for 44mm inlet tube, my calculations came to 21.36". That's for a straight tube inlet manifold. That's interesting isn't it.

George (down under)

This is hard for me to visualize as well.  Perhaps if you get a chance, you could snap a picture from the top.

Did you get 43 in. from #1 secondary to #2 secondary?

Bryan

 

---

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:29 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo

 

Dennis,

I just looked at your picture again…the secondary look much longer than the primaries.  It may be an optical illusion???  I bet you mean 1 1/8 id??

Bill B 

 

---

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Dennis Haverlah
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:03 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo

All my tubes are the same length and the same diameters.  I can check but I think they were 1 1/4 id. and 1 1/4 od.

Bill Bradburry wrote:

Dennis,

Aren’t your primary and secondary tubes different lengths from rotor face to rotor face?   If so, what are the two lengths?  Are they different diameters?

Bill B

 

---

 

---