X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4126475 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:54:31 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1117393A for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:53:53 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AC3DBEC060 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:53:52 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <912B6EB54E75444B800857C3D290F496@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:53:51 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0047_01CAAF39.61733FA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100215-1, 02/15/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01CAAF39.61733FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bryan, I missed where the 43" came from, however from my calculations for 44mm = inlet tube, my calculations came to 21.36". That's for a straight tube = inlet manifold. That's interesting isn't it. George (down under) This is hard for me to visualize as well. Perhaps if you get a = chance, you could snap a picture from the top. Did you get 43 in. from #1 secondary to #2 secondary? Bryan =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:29 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: = N.A. Renesis to turbo =20 Dennis, I just looked at your picture again.the secondary look much longer = than the primaries. It may be an optical illusion??? I bet you mean 1 = 1/8 id?? Bill B=20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Dennis Haverlah Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:03 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: = N.A. Renesis to turbo All my tubes are the same length and the same diameters. I can check = but I think they were 1 1/4 id. and 1 1/4 od. Bill Bradburry wrote: Dennis, Aren't your primary and secondary tubes different lengths from rotor = face to rotor face? If so, what are the two lengths? Are they = different diameters? Bill B =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01CAAF39.61733FA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bryan,

I missed where the 43" came from, = however from my=20 calculations for 44mm inlet tube, my calculations came to 21.36". That's = for a=20 straight tube inlet manifold. That's interesting isn't it.

George (down under)

This is = hard for me=20 to visualize as well. Perhaps if you get a chance, you could = snap a=20 picture from the top.

Did you get = 43 in.=20 from #1 secondary to #2 secondary?

Bryan

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 = 11:29=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs = Power was=20 : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo

Dennis,

I just looked at your picture again=85the = secondary look=20 much longer than the primaries. It may be an optical = illusion??? I=20 bet you mean 1 1/8 id??

Bill = B

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Dennis Haverlah
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 = 11:03=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs = Power was=20 : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to = turbo

All my tubes = are the same=20 length and the same diameters. I can check but I think they were = 1 1/4=20 id. and 1 1/4 od.

Bill Bradburry = wrote:

Denn= is,

Aren=92t your primary and secondary tubes = different=20 lengths from rotor face to rotor face? If so, what are the = two=20 lengths? Are they different = diameters?

Bill B

= ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01CAAF39.61733FA0--