X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4126328 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:03:27 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=clouduster@austin.rr.com Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=RtyKsw5fbDEA:10 a=D-pc1t-ipF9lDxkbqpEA:9 a=JzBmV1ggAJXOcxgxWCuKeX-ZHgEA:4 a=4PR2P7QzAAAA:8 a=wnq1228IlEB6HiVt8owA:9 a=G8B0NXIJZfbCzeHfju8A:7 a=B_tO1YZAe2cmvSmmjN5d_65zZikA:4 a=djSSOgbfo6cA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.25.157.35 Received: from [66.25.157.35] ([66.25.157.35:3764] helo=[10.0.0.99]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 82/56-13133-CE81A7B4; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:02:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7A18EC.1070204@austin.rr.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:02:52 -0600 From: Dennis Haverlah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070803030207070005010209" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070803030207070005010209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All my tubes are the same length and the same diameters. I can check but I think they were 1 1/4 id. and 1 1/4 od. Bill Bradburry wrote: > Dennis, > > Aren't your primary and secondary tubes different lengths from rotor > face to rotor face? If so, what are the two lengths? Are they > different diameters? > > > > Bill B > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------070803030207070005010209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All my tubes are the same length and the same diameters. I can check but I think they were 1 1/4 id. and 1 1/4 od.

Bill Bradburry wrote:

Dennis,

Aren’t your primary and secondary tubes different lengths from rotor face to rotor face? If so, what are the two lengths? Are they different diameters?

Bill B

--------------070803030207070005010209--