X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4105249 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:21:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524871735C2 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:21:00 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 544C9BEC030 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:20:59 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD Software Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:21:03 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01CAA267.79673AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100130-1, 01/30/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CAA267.79673AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, Welcome information, can you tell us what sort of climb and cruise = speeds we are looking at and what aircraft. Any other info is welcome, = like Delta T across the core etc. George (down under) FWIW, I my radiator core is 5.5" thick x 5.5" high x 20" wide . it = cools . JWW =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of George Lendich Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:49 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD Software =20 =20 Thomas, I like your approach to the problem, I see nothing but positive = outcomes in proving the concept (one way or another). 3.5" is ( I = believe) OK, the thick verses thin debate is like comparing apples and = oranges given the different applications of cars and aircraft. I don't = know what speed your looking at in cruise but 3.5" should be good for a = higher cruise. I believe some have used 3" cores successfully. However = I'm no expert but I look forward to the outcomes. George ( down under) Mike, The graphic is not a true representation of the final design. It = merely depicts an unmodified P-51 scoop that has been rendered in CAD, = scaled 61% and rotated lightly in the clockwise direction. =20 My actual radiator design has a frontal area of 203 sq in and a = depth of 3.5 in.=20 =20 As stated earlier, the purpose of the post was to announce my = willingness to share a software program that I had developed and found = useful. =20 T Mann This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for = the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. = Any unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received = this message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may = correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message. = Thank you. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CAA267.79673AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Jeff,
Welcome information, can you tell us = what sort of=20 climb and cruise speeds we are looking at and what aircraft. Any other = info is=20 welcome, like Delta T across the core etc.
George (down under)

FWIW,=20 I my radiator core is 5.5=94 thick x 5.5=94 high x 20=94 wide =85 it = cools =85=20   JWW

 

From: Rotary = motors in=20 aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = George=20 Lendich
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:49 PM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD=20 Software

 

 

Thomas,

I like = your=20 approach to the problem, I see nothing but positive outcomes in = proving the=20 concept (one way or another). 3.5" is ( I believe) OK, the thick = verses thin=20 debate is like comparing apples and oranges given the different = applications=20 of cars and aircraft. I don't know what speed your looking at in = cruise but=20 3.5" should be good for a higher cruise. I believe some have used 3" = cores=20 successfully. However I'm no expert but I look forward to the=20 outcomes.

George ( = down=20 under)

Mike,

The=20 graphic is not a true representation of the final design. It merely = depicts=20 an unmodified P-51 scoop that has been rendered in CAD, scaled 61% = and=20 rotated lightly in  the clockwise = direction.

 

My=20 actual radiator design has a frontal area of 203 sq in and a depth = of 3.5=20 in.

 

As=20 stated earlier, the purpose of the post was to announce my = willingness to=20 share a software program that I had developed and found=20 useful.

 

T=20 Mann


This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended = only for=20 the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. = Any=20 unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received = this=20 message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct = our=20 internal records. Please then delete the original message. Thank=20 you.
 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CAA267.79673AA0--