X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4104396 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:20:56 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.43; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100130032021.MAGG26337.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:20:21 -0500 Received: from willsPC ([68.105.86.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id bfLL1d00E1k005Q03fLMgF; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:20:21 -0500 X-VR-Score: -80.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=4cmh2gL1a6RJOvq2diO5/mV5P7W7DelkioqUudxRLMU= c=1 sm=1 a=WUKWvh78jHwA:10 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:17 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=sIA5Gn7dMdD3N_99nU4A:9 a=Mh3nmIVGj-fKynw97NYwMkENysQA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=y0kjeOYW15Z6RGrm:21 a=FAqEFj1ExXxyyAR0:21 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Y2VNeNrzAAAA:8 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=TW66zc2HAAAA:8 a=HQ31llbKAAAA:8 a=on22okXAAAAA:8 a=KXI_edVR7FC_aochZbwA:9 a=-PSozy2kaNRlHeUn6ygA:7 a=dOhXt3Aj9_3w6_oV2LL4nkUEl68A:4 a=at0Q5_2dr5wA:10 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4A4FCFA74C6245A5959B17089BC7100C@willsPC> From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD Software Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:20:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0065_01CAA118.1AE2D200" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CAA118.1AE2D200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Figures I'd make a statement like that and have somebody prove me wrong. = I cant remember Jeff, what airframe and what engine are you running? Mike Wills=20 From: Jeff Whaley=20 Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:51 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD Software FWIW, I my radiator core is 5.5" thick x 5.5" high x 20" wide . it cools = . JWW =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of George Lendich Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:49 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD Software =20 =20 Thomas, I like your approach to the problem, I see nothing but positive outcomes = in proving the concept (one way or another). 3.5" is ( I believe) OK, = the thick verses thin debate is like comparing apples and oranges given = the different applications of cars and aircraft. I don't know what speed = your looking at in cruise but 3.5" should be good for a higher cruise. I = believe some have used 3" cores successfully. However I'm no expert but = I look forward to the outcomes. George ( down under) Mike, The graphic is not a true representation of the final design. It = merely depicts an unmodified P-51 scoop that has been rendered in CAD, = scaled 61% and rotated lightly in the clockwise direction. =20 My actual radiator design has a frontal area of 203 sq in and a depth = of 3.5 in.=20 =20 As stated earlier, the purpose of the post was to announce my = willingness to share a software program that I had developed and found = useful. =20 T Mann This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for = the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. = Any unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received = this message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may = correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message. = Thank you. ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CAA118.1AE2D200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Figures I'd make a statement like that and = have somebody=20 prove me wrong. I cant remember Jeff, what airframe and what engine are = you=20 running?
 
Mike Wills 

Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:51 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD = Software

FWIW,=20 I my radiator core is 5.5=94 thick x 5.5=94 high x 20=94 wide =85 it = cools =85=20   JWW

 

From: Rotary = motors in=20 aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George = Lendich
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:49 PM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tiff to CAD=20 Software

 

 

Thomas,

I like your = approach=20 to the problem, I see nothing but positive outcomes in proving the = concept (one=20 way or another). 3.5" is ( I believe) OK, the thick verses thin debate = is like=20 comparing apples and oranges given the different applications of cars = and=20 aircraft. I don't know what speed your looking at in cruise but 3.5" = should be=20 good for a higher cruise. I believe some have used 3" cores = successfully.=20 However I'm no expert but I look forward to the=20 outcomes.

George ( = down=20 under)

Mike,

The=20 graphic is not a true representation of the final design. It merely = depicts an=20 unmodified P-51 scoop that has been rendered in CAD, scaled 61% and = rotated=20 lightly in  the clockwise direction.

 

My=20 actual radiator design has a frontal area of 203 sq in and a depth of = 3.5 in.=20

 

As=20 stated earlier, the purpose of the post was to announce my willingness = to=20 share a software program that I had developed and found=20 useful.

 

T=20 Mann


This message, and the documents attached hereto, is = intended only for=20 the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. = Any=20 unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received = this=20 message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct = our=20 internal records. Please then delete the original message. Thank=20 you.
 ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CAA118.1AE2D200--