Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #49817
From: George Lendich <lendich@aanet.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Wedge/Oblique Duct
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:31:08 +1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 Ed,
I have been thinking about this, if I use A1V1=A2V2 to solve for the inlet opening size, how do I know if the speed of air through the duct is correct i.e. 10% for cruise and 30% for climb.
 
Also If I use the Cessna 171 speed of approx 100 K for cruise = 10 K through core, 70 knot climb and approx 20 K through core. Do I then use the climb speed to calculate inlet air openings and attach an adjustable louver exit OR I suppose I could do as Tracy does and calculate for cruise and attach a spray bar.
 
I'm still a little confused on the best approach.
George ( down under)
BTW it's Australia Day today - arrival of the first fleet.
 

George, For the bell shaped duct, what I have read in K & W it appears they  say the inlet area should be between 0.25 – 0.40 of the core area.  The more slowing of the air velocity that needs to be done by the diffuser before the core that is needed appears to call for lower area ratio values of Ai/Ab (area inlet/area core).  In the example plotted of an streamline duct in K&W the chart shows the area ratio was 0.40.


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 6:16 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Wedge/Oblique Duct

 

Ed,

If Ai is .33 Ab and .44 Ab for the wedge ducts, what's it for the bell shaped duct - is there any  similar drawing?

George ( down under)

----- Original Message -----

From: Ed Anderson

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:39 AM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Wedge/Oblique Duct

 

 

George, here are two figures from K&W – one could be described as a “Wedge” figure 12-6 and the other one a “streamline” wedge figure 12-12.

 

Always  dangerous for me to try to interpret what K&W are really saying, but from what I get from these two figures, it would appear that the “streamline” wedge permits you to use a smaller inlet (Ai = 0.30 Ab) for the same performance (same losses) that you get with a larger opening Ai = 0.44 Ab for the pure Wedge.  But, that is just my take on it.

 

The slight bump (where the 64 deg angle is annotated) of the Streamline wedge may be to increase the boundary layer velocity to delay separation of the boundary layer  in that far corner where duct meets core. 

 

Ed

Ed Anderson

Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered

Matthews, NC

eanderson@carolina.rr.com

http://www.andersonee.com

http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html

http://www.flyrotary.com/

http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW

http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster