Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #49663
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:24:39 -0800
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Keep in mind that that the higher the DT, the lower the average rad temp, the larger rad needed. Optimization studies suggest that the optimal DT is about 25-30 degrees.  The drop you get is dependant on the flow rate.  Mazda knew what they were doing when they designed the pump, so if you’ve got other things right (particularly not too restrictive plumbing) you’ll get about that DT running at fairly high power.  Similar situation with the oil, you should see something in the neighborhood of 40 drop.

 

The limiting temps are on the coolant out of the engine (hottest point, must be kept below boiling); and on the oil returning (needed to cool the rotors without getting the side seals too hot. And don’t forget it’s also cooling the gears in the re-drive.).  The consensus seems to be max of not much over 210 for anything longer than a few minutes. That suggests the pan temp may get to 240-250.

 

Early in my test program it was not unusual that I saw oil temp of 220F during climb on a warm day. It apparently had no adverse effects.  After changes to the oil cooling it now peaks about 205.

 

It’s advisable to measure coolant and oil temp both in and out; as well as air temp in (OAT) and out.  You’ll need that info to diagnose coolant system function during initial operation.  Once you have everything working right you may rarely look at it again.

 

That’s my story, and I’m sticking to itJ.

 

Al G

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent:
Saturday, January 09, 2010 6:02 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe

 

Hi George,

 

The DT is, of course, the amount of temperature rise you get in your cooling air due to heat transfer from you heat exchanger.  Recall  Q = m * DT * Cp - so a 40F DT simply means you must have more m (air mass flow) than if the DT were 100F.  Since air mass flow = Velocity of air * Area (Frontal area of core in this case)  That would generally mean you either need a radiator with a larger frontal  area  and/or your velocity of your cooling air would need to be higher to get the greater air mass flow needed due to a lower DT.  That could add to your cooling drag due to the higher air velocity, but so long as the heat Q being removed is adequate, the engine doesn’t care  what combination of m and DT .

 

I have seen DT of 100F reported for the radiators by several, but I don’t recall off the top of my head  DT for the oil cooler.  Perhaps somebody who has measured theirs will report it.

 

Ed

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:37 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe

 

Mark,

That is a great monitoring system, I would like to do the same thing as you have done one day.  I'm not sure about how good the 40* delta-T is, I will let someone else comment of that, maybe Ed A.  as he  mentioned 80-100*F Delta -T for water, perhaps oil is half of that .

George ( down under)

Bill,

Since you didn't direct your question to any specific person, I'll tell you how I set up my engine monitoring system up.  I measure temp and pressure of both the oil and water.  I also measure water level (float switch in the purge tank) as well as the return water temp back into the engine (after the radiator).  So, from this I can tell how well my exchangers are working.  As an example, I normally see a 40* delta-T across the oil cooler.  If this drops, my temps go up and I need to land and find out what's not right.  I also measure coolant pressure.  If pressure is low / high, I need to investigate. 

 

Is this information overload?  Maybe, but I would rather have too much data than not enough.

 

Mark S.

 

 

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Am I correct in my assumption that the engine only has an oil pressure sensor and not an oil temperature sensor?  Is the only engine temperature monitored by the coolant temperature sensor??? 

 

Bill B

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Whaley
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe

Ben, you’re right in that any one probe does not tell the whole story, but specific to the Rotary if only one probe is provided/available then the input oil temperature is most important.  The oil flow diagrams show return oil from cooler is pumped through e-shaft and sprayed inside the rotors for their cooling.  Previous posts and literature state that the rotor oil seals will be damaged by sustained oil temperature >210F.

It is also important to use similar instrumentation to other builders for direct comparison from one installation to the next …

I only measure return oil temperature myself; I’d be interested to know what delta T’s (oil) other builders are seeing.

Jeff

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of ben haas
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 9:17 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe

 

I respectivly disagree on the oil temp sender location. One can have a very efficient oil cooler that removes alot of heat from the oil. Oil  'in' temps are important but,,,, You could possibly have a motor making alot of oil heat and slowing cooking the motor over time and not really know it. Just like with the water temp probe. One needs to know exactly what is happening in the motor in real time...  YMMV.

Ben Haas
www.haaspowerair.com



 


To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 06:18:39 -0600
From: msteitle@gmail.com
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water temp probe

Kevin,

 

I think you want to measure the temp of the coolant as it exits the engine.  That way you know how close you are to your upper operating limit.  If you have a second input, you can measure the temps after the radiator.

 

Oil temps are just the opposite... measure temps after oil has been through the cooler and is entering the engine.

 

Mark S. 

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:52 AM, kevin lane <n3773@comcast.net> wrote:

in looking for a place to mount a water temp probe I realized my radiator has a drain plug fitting on the bottom of one of the end tanks that could work.  that portion of the tank has cooled water about to return to the pump.   does it matter if I monitor the before or after radiator temps?  the engine sees both, right?   

same question as to the oil temp probe.  the stock oil cooler has a large fitting [plug?] underneath of one end tank, not sure of its usage.  also have an extra plug in the oil pan [out the side] which might work [?]  told that originally had a oil level sender unit in there.   kevin 

 


Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.


This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for the addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you.

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster