Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4963
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] seven degree divergence?
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:24:14 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 
 
From: kevin lane
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 7:38 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] seven degree divergence?

I keep seeing reference to 7 degree duct divergence, and the carpenter in me can't figure out how you place a typically straight-sided protractor against a curve to measure it.  anyone know?  seems to me something is missing, such as "per inch" so that the curve can be broken down into a series of small triangles.
Kevin Lane  Portland, OR
e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net
web-> http://home.comcast.net/~n3773
(browse w/ internet explorer)
 
Kevin,
 
    In some early studies on ducts, experimentation showed that if the straight walls (in this case not curved)  of a duct did not diverge more than 7 Deg from the intake to the cooler core that losses would be at a minimum. Apparently 7 Deg was the magic angle (I have seen references that indicated you might get away with as much as 10 Deg) which if you did not exceed would provide flow with no boundary layer separation.
 
  It is not 7 Deg per inch ( that would make it much more useable for aircraft), but 7 deg total.  So as you might imagine with only 7Deg if you core were any size at all the inlet would have to be many inches away.  Probably OK for wind tunnels {:>)
 
 That is one reason  why attempts were made to find low loss diffusion configurations that provided for shorter ducts.  I personally have never seen the original study, but I have seen it referenced  in many NACA studies on radiators, diffusers and ducts.
 
 
Ed Anderson
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster